ArticleEJNMMI physics2019
Noise reduction using a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm on a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage on Serum Inflammatory Factors in Patients with Pressure Ulcer by Intelligent Algorithm-Based CT Image.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Characterization of open-source BSREM reconstruction forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Image optimization for low-doseEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Does Q.Clear Processing Change PET Ratios? Quantitative Evidence Using BTXBrain-DAT.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Elucidation of FDG-PET Imaging Characteristics that Reflect the Heterogeneity within Tumors Due to Variability in Metabolic Activity: A Phantom Study.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of a deep learning-based image quality enhancement method on a digital-BGO PET/CT system forEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Improving image reconstruction to quantify dynamic whole-body PET/CT: Q.Clear versus OSEM.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-directed PET signal in the arterial tree is not consistently linked to calcified plaque burden and cardiovascular risk.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- β1600 Q.Clear Digital Reconstruction of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A position-adaptive noise-reduction method using a deep denoising filter bank for dedicated breast positron emission tomography images.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Kinetic Modeling of Brain [Metabolites · 2024Article
- Robustness of radiomic features in 123I-ioflupane-dopamine transporter single-photon emission computer tomography scan.PloS one · 2024Article
- Optimization of Q.Clear reconstruction for dynamicEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection onEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Rapid Whole-Body FDG PET/MRI in Oncology Patients: Utility of Combining Bayesian Penalised Likelihood PET Reconstruction and Abbreviated MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A heterogeneous phantom study for investigating the stability of PET images radiomic features with varying reconstruction settings.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- BSREM for Brain Metastasis Detection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Lung Cancer Patients.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQ.Clear is a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm for PET. It tries to improve image quality by controlling noise amplification during image reconstruction. In this study, the noise properties of this BSREM were compared to the ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm for both phantom and patient data acquired on a state-of-the-art PET/CT.
methodsThe NEMA IQ phantom and a whole-body patient study were acquired on a GE DMI 3-rings system in list mode and different datasets with varying noise levels were generated. Phantom data was evaluated using four different contrast ratios. These were reconstructed using BSREM with different β-factors of 300-3000 and with a clinical setting used for OSEM including point spread function (PSF) and time-of-flight (TOF) information. Contrast recovery (CR), background noise levels (coefficient of variation, COV), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to determine the performance in the phantom data. Findings based on the phantom data were compared with clinical data. For the patient study, the SUV ratio, metabolic active tumor volumes (MATVs), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were evaluated using the liver as the background region.
resultsBased on the phantom data for the same count statistics, BSREM resulted in higher CR and CNR and lower COV than OSEM. The CR of OSEM matches to the CR of BSREM with β = 750 at high count statistics for 8:1. A similar trend was observed for the ratios 6:1 and 4:1. A dependence on sphere size, counting statistics, and contrast ratio was confirmed by the CNR of the ratio 2:1. BSREM with β = 750 for 2.5 and 1.0 min acquisition has comparable COV to the 10 and 5.0 min acquisitions using OSEM. This resulted in a noise reduction by a factor of 2-4 when using BSREM instead of OSEM. For the patient data, a similar trend was observed, and SNR was reduced by at least a factor of 2 while preserving contrast.
conclusionThe BSREM reconstruction algorithm allowed a noise reduction without a loss of contrast by a factor of 2-4 compared to OSEM reconstructions for all data evaluated. This reduction can be used to lower the injected dose or shorten the acquisition time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.