Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822972›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Usefulness of imaging findings in predicting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer.

Filiz Çelebi, Filiz Agacayak, Alper Ozturk, Serkan Ilgun, Muhammed Ucuncu, Zeynep Erdogan Iyigun, Çetin Ordu, Kezban Nur Pilanci, Gul Alco, Serap Gultekin and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and radiological picture of the tumor.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Radiomic biomarkers of tumor immune biology and immunotherapy response.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Filiz ÇelebiDepartment of Radiology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Cemil Aslan Güder Sk. No:8, Gayrettepe/Beşiktaş, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey. elbuken.filiz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-4019
Filiz AgacayakDepartment of Radiology, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürrüyet Caddesi 161, Şişli, 34384, İstanbul, Turkey.
Alper OzturkBiruni University Hospital, Protokol Yolu No:45, 10.YılCd., Zeytinburnu, 34010, İstanbul, Turkey.
Serkan IlgunTaksim Education and Research Hospital, Karayolları Mahallesi, Osmanbey Caddesi, 621 Sokak, Gaziosmanpaşa, 34255, İstanbul, Turkey.
Muhammed UcuncuDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürrüyet Caddesi 161, Şişli, 34384, İstanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep Erdogan IyigunPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürrüyet Caddesi, Şişli, 34384, İstanbul, Turkey.
Çetin OrduDepartment of Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Cemil Aslan Güder Sk. No:8, Gayrettepe/Beşiktaş, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kezban Nur PilanciDepartment of Oncology, Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Bahcelievler Mah. Eski Londra Asf CD No:227, Bahcelievler, 34180, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gul AlcoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Cemil Aslan Güder Sk. No:8, Gayrettepe/Beşiktaş, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serap GultekinFaculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Gazi University, Bestepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Emetullah CindilFaculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Gazi University, Bestepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Gursel SoybirDepartment of General Surgery, Memorial Etiler Hospital, Nispetiye st. Erdolen Ishanı no:38, Etiler, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatma AktepeDepartment of Pathology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Cemil Aslan Güder Sk. No:8, Gayrettepe/Beşiktaş, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Vahit ÖzmenDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürrüyet Caddesi, Şişli, 34384, İstanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital · TRGazi University · TRBiruni University · TRIstanbul Memorial Hospital · TRMemorial Sisli Hospital · TRTaksim German Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been determined as a new prognostic indicator of immunotherapy response in breast cancer (BC). The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of imaging features in predicting the TIL levels in invasive BC patients.

methodsA total of 158 patients with invasive BC were included in our study. All lesions were evaluated based on the BIRADS lexicon. US was performed for all the patients and 89 of them underwent MRI. The histologic stromal TIL (sTIL) levels were assessed and associations between the sTIL levels and imaging features were evaluated.

resultsTumors with high sTIL levels had more circumscribed margins, round shape, heterogeneous echogenicity, and larger size on ultrasonography (p < 0.005). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the sTIL levels and ADC value (p < 0.001). Tumors with high sTIL levels had significantly more homogeneous enhancement than the tumors with low sTIL levels (p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the ADC was the most statistically significant parameter in predicting the sTIL levels (the odds ratio was 90.952; p = 0.002). The optimal cutoff value for ADC in predicting low and high sTIL levels was found to be 0.87 × 10

conclusionsImaging findings, especially the ADC, may play an important role as an adjunct tool in cases of uncertain situations and may improve the accuracy of biopsy results. The prediction of sTIL levels using imaging findings may give an opportunity to predict prognosis. KEY POINTS: • Preoperative assessment of TILs is an important biomarker of prognosis and treatment efficacy. • ADC value can be a useful tool in distinguishing high and low sTIL levels as a non-invasive method. • The prediction of sTIL levels using imaging findings may give an opportunity to predict prognosis and an optimal treatment for the BC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedPrognosisUltrasonography, MammaryBreast cancerDiffusionLymphocytesMagnetic resonance imagingTumor

Identifiers

PMID31822972
OpenAlexW2991970218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.