Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822969›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

Texture analysis and machine learning algorithms accurately predict histologic grade in small (< 4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a pilot study.

Shawn Haji-Momenian, Zixian Lin, Bhumi Patel, Nicole Law, Adam Michalak, Anishsanjay Nayak, James Earls, Murray Loew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shawn Haji-MomenianDepartment of Radiology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. shajimomenian@mfa.gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6236-4956
Zixian LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, 5000 Science & Engineering Hall, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Bhumi PatelDepartment of Radiology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Nicole LawDepartment of Radiology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Adam MichalakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Altoona, 501 Howard Avenue, Suite F2, Altoona, PA, 16601, USA.
Anishsanjay NayakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, 5000 Science & Engineering Hall, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
James EarlsDepartment of Radiology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Murray LoewDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, 5000 Science & Engineering Hall, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo predict the histologic grade of small clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) using texture analysis and machine learning algorithms.

methodsFifty-two noncontrast (NC), 26 corticomedullary (CM) phase, and 35 nephrographic (NG) phase CTs of small (< 4 cm) surgically resected ccRCCs were retrospectively identified. Surgical pathology classified the tumors as low- or high-Fuhrman histologic grade. The axial image with the largest cross-sectional tumor area was exported and segmented. Six histogram and 31 texture (gray-level co-occurrences (GLC) and gray-level run-lengths (GLRL)) features were calculated for each tumor in each phase. T testing compared feature values in low- and high-grade ccRCCs, with a (Benjamini-Hochberg) false discovery rate of 10%. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was calculated for each feature to assess prediction of low- and high-grade ccRCCs in each phase. Histogram, texture, and combined histogram and texture data sets were used to train and test four algorithms (k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forests, and decision tree) with tenfold cross-validation; AUCs were calculated for each algorithm in each phase to assess prediction of low- and high-grade ccRCCs.

resultsZero, 23, and 0 features in the NC, CM, and NG phases had statistically significant differences between low and high-grade ccRCCs. CM histogram skewness and GLRL short run emphasis had the highest AUCs (0.82) in predicting histologic grade. All four algorithms had the highest AUCs (0.97) predicting histologic grade using CM histogram features. The algorithms' AUCs decreased using histogram or texture features from NC or NG phases.

conclusionThe histologic grade of small ccRCCs can be accurately predicted with machine learning algorithms using CM histogram features, which outperform NC and NG phase image data.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPilot ProjectsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesClear cell renal cell carcinomaHistologyMachine learningTexture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.