Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822864›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2020

Targeted deep-intronic sequencing in a cohort of unexplained cases of suspected Lynch syndrome.

Anke Marie Arnold, Monika Morak, Anna Benet-Pagès, Andreas Laner, Dimitrij Frishman, Elke Holinski-Feder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anke Marie ArnoldMedizinisch Genetisches Zentrum-MGZ, Munich, Germany.
Monika MorakMedizinisch Genetisches Zentrum-MGZ, Munich, Germany.
Anna Benet-PagèsMedizinisch Genetisches Zentrum-MGZ, Munich, Germany.
Andreas LanerMedizinisch Genetisches Zentrum-MGZ, Munich, Germany.
Dimitrij Frishman *Department of Bioinformatics, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Elke Holinski-Feder *Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum-MGZ, Munich, Germany. elke.holinski-feder@mgz-muenchen.de.
Medical Genetics Center · DEWeihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid) 111222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) is caused by germline defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway, resulting in microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and loss of immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of the respective protein in tumor tissue. However, not in all clinically suspected LS patients with MSI-H tumors and IHC-loss, causative germline alterations in the MMR genes can be detected. Here, we investigated 128 of these patients to possibly define new pathomechanisms. A search for large genomic rearrangements and deep-intronic regulatory variants was performed via targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of exonic, intronic, and chromosomal regions upstream and downstream of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, MLH3, MSH3, PMS1, and EPCAM. Within this cohort, two different large rearrangements causative for LS were detected in three cases, belonging to two families (2.3%). The sensitivity to detect large rearrangements or copy number variations (CNV) was evaluated to be 50%. In 9 of the 128 patients (7%), previously overlooked pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNV) and two variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. Pathogenic aberrations were not found in MLH3, MSH3, and PMS1. A potential effect on regulation was exerted for 19% of deep-intronic SNVs, predominantly located in chromosomal regions where the modification of histone proteins suggests an enhancer function. In conclusion, conventional variation analysis of coding regions is missing rare genomic rearrangements, nevertheless they should be analyzed. Assessment of deep-intronic SNVs is so far non-conclusive for medical questioning.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIntronsMutL ProteinsMutS ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeMutL ProteinsMutS Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31822864
PMCPMC7170855
OpenAlexW2996305250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.