Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822854›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2020

How do different lighting conditions affect the vision and quality of life of people with glaucoma? A systematic review.

Jamie Enoch, Lee Jones, Deanna J Taylor, Carol Bronze, James F Kirwan, Pete R Jones, David P Crabb

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of citicoline oral solution on quality of life in patients with glaucoma: the results of an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Development and Validation of the Assessment of Low Luminance Vision-Related Activities.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Contrast sensitivity function under three light conditions in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy: a cross-sectional, case-control study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie EnochDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-6676
Lee JonesDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1211
Deanna J TaylorDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-5225
Carol BronzePatient representative, London, UK.
James F KirwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-4641
Pete R JonesDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-8397
David P CrabbDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK. David.Crabb.1@city.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8754-3902
City, University of London · GBQueen Alexandra Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is a systematic review of evidence regarding the impact of different lighting conditions on the vision and quality of life (QoL) of people with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A systematic literature search was carried out using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, Embase, and Ovid Nursing Database for studies: published up to April 2019; including people diagnosed with POAG; and assessing visual function or QoL in response to changing lighting/luminance levels or glare. Two researchers independently screened studies for eligibility. Data were extracted from eligible studies regarding study design, participant characteristics, outcomes, and results. Quality of included studies was critically appraised. Of 8437 studies, 56 eligible studies were included. Studies investigated the effects of lighting on the following domains among people with POAG: QoL (18/56), psychophysical measures (16/56), functional vision (10/56), activities of daily living (10/56), and qualitative findings (2/56). POAG negatively affects low-luminance contrast sensitivity, glare symptoms, and dark adaptation time and extent. In vision-related QoL questionnaires, people with POAG report problems with lighting, glare, and dark adaptation more frequently than any other domain. These problems worsen with progressing visual field loss. Early-stage POAG patients experience significantly more difficulties in low-luminance or changing lighting conditions than age-matched controls (AMCs), challenging perceptions of early-stage POAG as asymptomatic. However, performance-based studies seldom show significant differences between POAG participants and AMCs on tasks simulating daily activities under non-optimal lighting conditions. Further research with larger samples is required to optimise ambient and task-oriented lighting that can support patients' adaptation to POAG.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleActivities of Daily LivingHumansLightingQuality of LifeVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID31822854
PMCPMC7002549
OpenAlexW2995444555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.