ArticleGut2020
Suboptimal endoscopic cancer recognition in colorectal lesions in a national bowel screening programme.
Article in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reasoning in machine vision by learning fast and slow thinking.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Early Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection Within the Therapeutic Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The predictive value of contrast-enhanced CT characteristics combined with composite inflammatory markers for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Circulating tumor DNA methylation-based method for noninvasive detection and stage stratification of colorectal tumor.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis system for predicting deeply invasive colorectal cancer: a comparison with a prospective study using magnifying chromoendoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Accuracy and variability of locoregional staging in T1 rectal cancer: nationwide multicentre cohort study.BJS open · 2025Observational
- Resection of Early Colorectal Neoplasms Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- CT morphological features for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.European radiology · 2023Article
- Advances in artificial intelligence and computer science for computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps: current status.Endoscopy international open · 2023Review
- Long-term oncological outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness resection after previous incomplete resection of low-risk T1 CRC (LOCAL-study): study protocol of a national prospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- New method for real-time visualization and quantitative characterization of early colorectal cancer in endoscopy: a pilot study.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2022Review
- Clinicopathological features of small T1 colorectal cancers.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Management of large polyps in a colorectal cancer screening program with fecal immunochemical test: a community- and population-based observational study.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Compound Endoscopic Morphological Features for Identifying Non-Pedunculated Lesions ≥20 mm with Intramucosal Neoplasia.Cancers · 2021Article
- A Liquid Biopsy Assay for Noninvasive Identification of Lymph Node Metastases in T1 Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted colonic endocytoscopy for cancer recognition: a multicenter study.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Systematic Review on Optical Diagnosis of Early Gastrointestinal Neoplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.