Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822545›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Analysis of caesarean section and neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural district hospital in Tanzania: an observational retrospective study.

Francesca Tognon, Angela Borghero, Giovanni Putoto, Donald Maziku, Giovanni Fernando Torelli, Gaetano Azzimonti, Ana Pilar Betran

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca TognonDipartimento di Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Universita degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di Medicina, Padova, Italy francesca.tognon.1@phd.unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-1525
Angela BorgheroTosamaganga Council Designated Hospital, Cuamm Medici con l'Africa, Iringa, United Republic of Tanzania.
Giovanni PutotoResearch Unit, Cuamm Medici con l'Africa, Padova, Veneto, Italy.
Donald MazikuMaternity Department, Tosamaganga Council Designated Hospital, Iringa, United Republic of Tanzania.
Giovanni Fernando TorelliTosamaganga Council Designated Hospital, Cuamm Medici con l'Africa, Iringa, United Republic of Tanzania.
Gaetano AzzimontiTosamaganga Council Designated Hospital, Cuamm Medici con l'Africa, Iringa, United Republic of Tanzania.
Ana Pilar BetranUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCaesarean section (CS) rates have increased worldwide in recent decades. In 2015, the WHO proposed the use of the 10-group Robson classification as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates both within healthcare facilities over time and between them. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of CS rates according to the Robson classification and describe maternal and perinatal outcomes by group at the Tosamaganga Hospital in rural Tanzania.

designObservational retrospective study.

settingSt. John of the Cross Tosamaganga Hospital, a referral centre in rural Tanzania.

participants3012 women who gave birth in Tosamaganga Hospital from 1 January to 30 June 2014 and from 1 March to 30 November 2015.

resultsThe overall CS rate was 35.2%, and about 90% of women admitted for labour were in Robson groups 1 through 5. More than 40% of the CS carried out in the hospital were performed on nulliparous women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation (groups 1 and 3), and the most frequent indication for the procedure was previous uterine scar (39.2%). The majority of severe neonatal outcomes were observed in groups 1 (27.7%), 10 (24.5%) and 3 (19.1%).

conclusionWe recorded a high CS rate in Tosamaganga Hospital, particularly in low-risk patients groups (Robson groups 1 and 3). Our analysis of Robson classification and neonatal outcomes suggests the need to improve labour management at the hospital and to provide timely referrals in order to prevent women from arriving there in critical conditions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHospitals, DistrictHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRural PopulationTanzaniaYoung Adult10-group classification systemcesarean sectionneonatal outcomeRobson classificationTanzania

Identifiers

PMID31822545
PMCPMC6924846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.