Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822543›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Speaking Up for Fundamental Care: the ILC Aalborg Statement.

Alison Kitson, Devin Carr, Tiffany Conroy, Rebecca Feo, Mette Grønkjær, Getty Huisman-de Waal, Debra Jackson, Lianne Jeffs, Jane Merkley, Åsa Muntlin Athlin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The development of nursing-sensitive indicators: A critical discussion.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alison KitsonCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia alison.kitson@flinders.edu.au.
Devin CarrUniversity Hospital and Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Tiffany ConroyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rebecca FeoCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9414-2242
Mette GrønkjærDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Getty Huisman-de WaalRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Debra JacksonFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lianne JeffsLunenfeld-Tananbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jane MerkleyLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Åsa Muntlin AthlinDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jennifer ParrPatient Experience and Nursing, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
David A RichardsCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-5027
Erik Elgaard SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Yvonne WengströmDivision of Neurobiology Care Science and Society, Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1214-10001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe International Learning Collaborative (ILC) is an organisation dedicated to understanding why fundamental care, the care required by all patients regardless of clinical condition, fails to be provided in healthcare systems globally. At its 11th annual meeting in 2019, nursing leaders from 11 countries, together with patient representatives, confirmed that patients' fundamental care needs are still being ignored and nurses are still afraid to 'speak up' when these care failures occur. While the ILC's efforts over the past decade have led to increased recognition of the importance of fundamental care, it is not enough. To generate practical, sustainable solutions, we need to substantially rethink fundamental care and its contribution to patient outcomes and experiences, staff well-being, safety and quality, and the economic viability of healthcare systems. KEY ARGUMENTS: We present five propositions for radically transforming fundamental care delivery:Value: fundamental care must be foundational to all caring activities, systems and institutionsTalk: fundamental care must be explicitly articulated in all caring activities, systems and institutions.Do: fundamental care must be explicitly actioned and evaluated in all caring activities, systems and institutions.Own: fundamental care must be owned by each individual who delivers care, works in a system that is responsible for care or works in an institution whose mission is to deliver care. RESEARCH: fundamental care must undergo systematic and high-quality investigations to generate the evidence needed to inform care practices and shape health systems and education curricula.

conclusionFor radical transformation within health systems globally, we must move beyond nursing and ensure all members of the healthcare team-educators, students, consumers, clinicians, leaders, researchers, policy-makers and politicians-value, talk, do, own and research fundamental care. It is only through coordinated, collaborative effort that we will, and must, achieve real change.

Indexed as

Universal Health CareDelivery of Health CareHealth Planning OrganizationsHumansInternational CooperationNursinghealth and safetyhealth services administration & managementquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID31822543
PMCPMC6924742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.