Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822490›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2019

Experience of primary care for people with HIV: a mixed-method analysis.

Tanvi Rai, Jane Bruton, Meaghan Kall, Richard Ma, Erica Pufall, Sophie Day, Valerie Delpech, Helen Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanvi RaiResearch Associate, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK tanvi.rai@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-9780
Jane BrutonClinical Research Manager, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Meaghan KallPrincipal Scientist, HIV/STI Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Richard MaGeneral Practitioner and NIHR Doctoral Research Fellow, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-2785
Erica PufallResearch Associate, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sophie DayVisiting Professor of Anthropology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Valerie DelpechHead of HIV Surveillance, Public Health England, London, UK.
Helen WardProfessor of Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Public Health England · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBFaculty of Public Health · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2017-10-181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in treatment have transformed HIV into a long-term condition (LTC), presenting fresh challenges for health services, HIV specialists, and GPs.

aimTo explore the experience of people living with HIV (PLHIV) regarding consulting their GPs. DESIGN &

settingA mixed-method analysis using data from two sources: a nationally-representative survey of PLHIV and a qualitative study with London-based PLHIV.

methodUnivariate logistic regression was used for quantitative data and framework analysis for qualitative data.

resultsThe survey had 4422 participants; the qualitative study included 52 participants. In both studies, registration with a GP and HIV status disclosure were high. Similar to general population trends, recent GP use was associated with poor self-rated health status, comorbidities, older age, and lower socioeconomic status. Two-thirds reported a good experience with GPs; a lower proportion felt comfortable asking HIV-related questions. Actual or perceived HIV stigma were consistently associated with poor satisfaction. In the interviews, participants with additional LTCs valued sensitive and consistent support from GPs. Some anticipated, and sometimes experienced, problems relating to HIV status, as well as GPs' limited experience and time to manage their complex needs. Sometimes they took their own initiative to facilitate coordination and communication. For PLHIV, a 'good' GP offered continuity and took time to know and accept them without judgment.

conclusionThe authors suggest clarification of roles and provision of relevant support to build the confidence of PLHIV in GPs and primary care staff to care for them. As the PLHIV population ages, there is a strong need to develop trusting patient-GP relationships and HIV-friendly GP practices.

Indexed as

chronic diseaseempathygeneral practiceHIVHIV infectionspatient satisfactionqualitative researchsocial stigmasurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31822490
PMCPMC6995868
OpenAlexW2962749101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.