Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822267›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Biosafety and biosecurity requirements for Orientia spp. diagnosis and research: recommendations for risk-based biocontainment, work practices and the case for reclassification to risk group 2.

Stuart D Blacksell, Matthew T Robinson, Paul N Newton, Soiratchaneekorn Ruanchaimun, Jeanne Salje, Tri Wangrangsimakul, Matthew D Wegner, Mohammad Yazid Abdad, Allan M Bennett, Allen L Richards and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Stuart D BlacksellMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. stuart@tropmedres.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-726X
Matthew T RobinsonCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK.
Paul N NewtonCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK.
Soiratchaneekorn RuanchaimunMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Jeanne SaljeMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Tri WangrangsimakulMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Matthew D WegnerArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Mohammad Yazid AbdadInfectious Disease Research Laboratory, National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore.
Allan M BennettPublic Health England, Biosafety, Air and Water Microbiology Group, Porton, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 0JG, UK.
Allen L RichardsDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
John StenosAustralian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Nicholas P J DayMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THMahosot Hospital · LAArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THGeelong Hospital · AUNational Centre for Infectious Diseases · SGPublic Health England · GBUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106698/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scrub typhus is an important arthropod-borne disease causing significant acute febrile illness by infection with Orientia spp.Using a risk-based approach, this review examines current practice, the evidence base and regulatory requirements regarding matters of biosafety and biosecurity, and presents the case for reclassification from Risk Group 3 to Risk Group 2 along with recommendations for safe working practices of risk-based activities during the manipulation of Orientia spp. in the laboratory.We recommend to reclassify Orientia spp. to Risk Group 2 based on the classification for RG2 pathogens as being moderate individual risk, low community risk. We recommend that low risk activities, can be performed within a biological safety cabinet located in a Biosafety Level (BSL) 2 core laboratory using standard personal protective equipment. But when the risk assessment indicates, such as high concentration and volume, or aerosol generation, then a higher biocontainment level is warranted. For, the majority of animal activities involving Orientia spp., Animal BSL 2 (ABSL2) is recommended however where high risk activities are performed including necropsies, Animal BSL (ABSL3) is recommended.

Indexed as

Containment of BiohazardsGuidelines as TopicHumansOrientia tsutsugamushiResearchRisk AssessmentScrub TyphusWorkplaceBiocontainmentBiosafetyOrientiaRisk groupScrub typhus

Identifiers

PMID31822267
PMCPMC6902544
OpenAlexW2996743563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.