ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2020
Complex cerebral aneurysms: intra-luminal reconstruction using Pipeline flow-diverting stent and the obliteration mechanism.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flow diverter with or without adjunctive coils in the treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Pericallosal artery aneurysms: an evidence-based analysis of clinical presentations, therapeutic approaches, and outcome.Neurosurgical review · 2025Review
- The off-label uses of pipeline embolization device for complex cerebral aneurysms: Mid-term follow-up in a single center.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Modeling Fibrin Accumulation on Flow-Diverting Devices for Intracranial Aneurysms.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of Surpass Evolve Flow diverter for intracranial aneurysms: A study of 116 patients.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- Classification of anterior communicating aneurysms on a basis of endovascular treatments.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter.The neuroradiology journal · 2020Review
- Pipeline Flex embolisation device with Shield Technology for the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms: periprocedural and 6 month outcomes.The neuroradiology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with complex cerebral aneurysms can now be treated intravascularly with the help of flow-diverting stents. The primary purpose of this article is to document the clinical and angiographic outcomes in 80 patients who were treated with the Pipeline flow-diverting stent (PFS; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and the obliteration mechanism was discussed. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween October 2015 and October 2019, 80 patients with 90 complex (undefined neck, large/giant, blood blister-like, and recurrent side-wall) cerebral aneurysms treated with the PFS were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-five patients were women and 35 were men, with a mean age of 52 years. Large or giant aneurysms were defined as 10 mm or larger and small aneurysms were defined as less than 10 mm at the largest diameter measured on angiogram.
resultsForty-one aneurysms (45.6%) were large or giant, 41 (45.6%) were small, four (4.4%) were recurrent side-wall aneurysms and four (4.4%) were blood blister-like aneurysms. In total, 87 PFSs were placed in 80 patients with 90 aneurysms. In six patients, coexisting proximal stenosis of parent artery was also covered with PFS without balloon angioplasty. Adjunct coils were placed in 31 aneurysms (34%). One patient died of intracerebral hematoma after thrombolysis. There was one intrastent occlusion at six-month follow-up without any symptoms. The morbidity and the mortality rate is 0% and 1.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0%-3.7%). Control angiography was available in 74 (92.5%) patients with 83 aneurysms, and the aneurysm occlusion rate was 98.8% (95% CI, 96.5%-100%) in 6 to 12 months.
conclusionFor wide-necked saccular, large/giant, blood blister-like aneurysms and recurrent side-wall aneurysms, PFS is a valid and safe treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.