Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31822121›Full record

ReviewCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2019

Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.

Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Rohan Kumar Ochani, Asim Shaikh, Muhammad Shariq Usman, Naser Yamani, Safi U Khan, M Hassan Murad, John Mandrola, Rami Doukky, Richard A Krasuski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The fragility index and reverse fragility index of FDA investigational device exemption trials in spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. The statistical fragility of intramedullary reaming in tibial nail fixation: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  10. Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muhammad Shahzeb KhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL (M.S.K., N.Y.).
Rohan Kumar OchaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (R.K.O., A.S., M.S.U.).
Asim ShaikhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (R.K.O., A.S., M.S.U.).
Muhammad Shariq UsmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (R.K.O., A.S., M.S.U.).
Naser YamaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL (M.S.K., N.Y.).
Safi U KhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, West Virginia University (S.U.K.).
M Hassan MuradEvidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.H.M.).
John MandrolaBaptist Medical Center, Louisville, KY (J.M.).
Rami DoukkyDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (R.D.).
Richard A KrasuskiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (R.A.K.).

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficacy of an intervention is commonly evaluated using METHODS AND

resultsWe searched Medline from 2007 to 2017 to identify cardiovascular RCTs published in 6 high impact journals (

conclusionsConsiderable variations in FI were observed among cardiovascular trials, suggesting the need for careful interpretation of results, particularly when number of patients lost to follow-up exceeds FI.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSample SizeBiasCardiovascular DiseasesData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLost to Follow-UpPredictive Value of TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTreatment Outcomebiascardiovascular systemfragility indexheart failuresample size

Identifiers

PMID31822121
PMCPMC7962007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.