Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31821588›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2020

Implant surface alters compartmental-specific contributions to fixation strength in rats.

Frank C Ko, Matthew J Meagher, Maleeha Mashiatulla, Ryan D Ross, Amarjit S Virdi, Dale R Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Activation of canonical Wnt signaling accelerates intramembranous bone regeneration in male mice.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  3. The relative contribution of bone microarchitecture and matrix composition to implant fixation strength in rats.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frank C KoDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-7305-7946
Matthew J MeagherDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Maleeha MashiatullaDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Ryan D RossDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-3760-234X
Amarjit S VirdiDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-8834-2659
Dale R SumnerDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-9575-3862

Funding

Detection and Treatment of Peri-Implant OsteolysisR01AR066562 · NIAMS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUMNER, D RICK · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Role of the Gut Microbiome in Implant LooseningR21AR075130 · NIAMS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUMNER, D RICK · 2019 to 2020
$380k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066562NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR075130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical fixation of the implant to host bone is an important contributor to orthopedic implant survivorship. The relative importance of bone-implant contact, trabecular bone architecture, and cortical bone geometry to implant fixation strength has never been directly tested, especially in the settings of differential implant surface properties. Thus, using a rat model where titanium rods were placed into the intramedullary canal of the distal femur, we determined the relative contribution of bone-implant contact and peri-implant bone architecture to the fixation strength in implants with different surface roughness: highly polished and smooth (as-received) and dual acid-etched (DAE) implants. Using a training set that maximized variance in implant fixation strength, we initially examined correlation between implant fixation strength and outcome parameters from microcomputed tomography and found that osseointegration volume per total volume (OV/TV), trabecular bone volume per total volume (BV/TV), and cortical thickness (Ct.Th) were the single best compartment-specific predictors of fixation strength. We defined separate regression models to predict implant fixation strength for as-received and DAE implants. When the training set models were applied to independent validation sets, we found strong correlations between predicted and experimentally measured implant fixation strength, with r

Indexed as

Implants, ExperimentalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCalcification, PhysiologicOsseointegrationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySurface Propertiesbone-implant contactimplant fixation strengthmicroCTosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID31821588
PMCPMC7225079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.