ArticleMedical physics2020
Incorporating human and learned domain knowledge into training deep neural networks: A differentiable dose-volume histogram and adversarial inspired framework for generating Pareto optimal dose distributions in radiation therapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving deep-learning IMRT plan quality for lymphoma using deliverability-aware training.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- An interactive virtual dosimetrist for adjusting radiotherapy dose quality.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluating dose distribution in prostate IMRT patients using deep learning: the influence of loss function on model performance.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Explicit modeling of beam geometry improves three-dimensional dose prediction for esophageal cancer radiotherapy under heterogeneous beam configurations.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning-Based 3D Dose Distribution Prediction for VMAT Lung Cancer Treatment Using an Enhanced UNet3D Architecture with Composite Loss Functions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A deep learning-driven automated treatment planning framework for cervical cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- A universal framework for IMRT dose prediction.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Fully automated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for rectal cancer based on deep learning predictions of three-dimensional dose distributions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Integrating Humidity-Resistant and Colorimetric COF-on-MOF Sensors with Artificial Intelligence Assisted Data Analysis for Visualization of Volatile Organic Compounds Sensing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A deep learning model to predict dose distributions for breast cancer radiotherapy.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- High-dose-rate Brachytherapy Planning with Dendrite Cross-Attention UNet.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025Article
- Enhancing neuro-oncology care through equity-driven applications of artificial intelligence.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Neural network dose prediction for cervical brachytherapy: Overcoming data scarcity for applicator-specific models.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Human-like intelligent automatic treatment planning of head and neck cancer radiation therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Advantages of IMRT optimization with MCO compared to IMRT optimization without MCO in reducing small bowel high dose index for cervical cancer patients-individualized treatment options.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- TrDosePred: A deep learning dose prediction algorithm based on transformers for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Implementation and evaluation of an intelligent automatic treatment planning robot for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023Article
- [Deep learning-based dose prediction in radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2023Article
- Automated treatment planning framework for brachytherapy of cervical cancer using 3D dose predictions.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe propose a novel domain-specific loss, which is a differentiable loss function based on the dose-volume histogram (DVH), and combine it with an adversarial loss for the training of deep neural networks. In this study, we trained a neural network for generating Pareto optimal dose distributions, and evaluate the effects of the domain-specific loss on the model performance.
methodsIn this study, three loss functions - mean squared error (MSE) loss, DVH loss, and adversarial (ADV) loss - were used to train and compare four instances of the neural network model: (a) MSE, (b) MSE + ADV, (c) MSE + DVH, and (d) MSE + DVH+ADV. The data for 70 prostate patients, including the planning target volume (PTV), and the organs at risk (OAR) were acquired as 96 × 96 × 24 dimension arrays at 5 mm
resultsTraining for 100 000 iterations took 1.5 days (MSE), 3.5 days (MSE+ADV), 2.3 days (MSE+DVH), and 3.8 days (MSE+DVH+ADV). After training, the prediction time of each model is 0.052 s. Quantitatively, the MSE+DVH+ADV model had the lowest prediction error of 0.038 (conformation), 0.026 (homogeneity), 0.298 (R50), 1.65% (D95), 2.14% (D98), and 2.43% (D99). The MSE model had the worst prediction error of 0.134 (conformation), 0.041 (homogeneity), 0.520 (R50), 3.91% (D95), 4.33% (D98), and 4.60% (D99). For both the mean dose PTV error and the max dose PTV, Body, Bladder and rectum error, the MSE+DVH+ADV outperformed all other models. Regardless of model, all predictions have an average mean and max dose error <2.8% and 4.2%, respectively.
conclusionThe MSE+DVH+ADV model performed the best in these categories, illustrating the importance of both human and learned domain knowledge. Expert human domain-specific knowledge can be the largest driver in the performance improvement, and adversarial learning can be used to further capture nuanced attributes in the data. The real-time prediction capabilities allow for a physician to quickly navigate the tradeoff space for a patient, and produce a dose distribution as a tangible endpoint for the dosimetrist to use for planning. This is expected to considerably reduce the treatment planning time, allowing for clinicians to focus their efforts on the difficult and demanding cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.