Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31821457›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2019

Impact of last lenalidomide dose, duration, and IMiD-free interval in patients with myeloma treated with pomalidomide/dexamethasone.

Efstathios Kastritis, Maria Roussou, Maria Gavriatopoulou, Nikolaos Kanellias, Magdalini Migkou, Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, Dimitrios C Ziogas, Despina Fotiou, Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioanna Dialoupi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Efstathios KastritisDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Maria RoussouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Maria GavriatopoulouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Nikolaos KanelliasDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Magdalini MigkouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Evangelos Eleutherakis-PapaiakovouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Dimitrios C ZiogasDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Despina FotiouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Ioannis Ntanasis-StathopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Ioanna DialoupiDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Stavroula GiannouliSecond Department of Internal Medicine, and.
Panagiotis TsirigotisSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Propaedeutic, ''ATTIKON'' General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Sossana DelimpasiDepartment of Haematology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece; and.
Despina MparmparousiHaematology Laboratory and.
Mairylin Spyropoulou-VlachouImmunology Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Aikaterini XirokostaHaematology Laboratory and.
Evangelos TerposDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.
Meletios A DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To gain insights into the characteristics of clinical resistance to lenalidomide, we evaluated the outcomes of 147 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma (MM) homogeneously treated with immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) for relapsed and/or refractory MM (median, 3 prior lines of treatment). We focused our analysis on the effect of the lenalidomide dose at which resistance was developed, the duration of lenalidomide exposure, and lenalidomide-free interval. On intent to treat, 33% of patients achieved ≥partial remission (PR) with Pd. When Pd was given immediately after lenalidomide, ≥PR was 32% (vs 37% after bortezomib). The response rates were similar for patients that received 5 to 15 mg vs 25 mg of lenalidomide (38.5% vs 30.5%, P = .329). Response rates were higher for patients that had received at least 12 months of lenalidomide (44% vs 27%) and for those with ≥18 months from last lenalidomide dose to pomalidomide dose (65% vs 23%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 and 12.1 months, respectively, which was similar for patients who received lenalidomide, bortezomib or other regimens just before Pd and similar for patients who were receiving different doses of lenalidomide. IMiD-free interval ≥18 months was associated with longer PFS (10.3 vs 3.9 months, P = .003) and OS (27.1 vs 9.3, P = .008) as well as duration of last lenalidomide therapy ≥12 months (PFS: 7.8 vs 3.2, P = .023; OS: 16.5 vs 7.9, P = .005) even after adjustment for the number of prior therapies, duration of disease, and last lenalidomide dose.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneDrug Dosage CalculationsHumansLenalidomideMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaProgression-Free SurvivalThalidomideAngiogenesis InhibitorsDexamethasoneLenalidomidepomalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID31821457
PMCPMC6963239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.