Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31821437›Full record

GuidelineJAMA2019

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

US Preventive Services Task Force, Douglas K Owens, Karina W Davidson, Alex H Krist, Michael J Barry, Michael Cabana, Aaron B Caughey, Chyke A Doubeni, John W Epling, Martha Kubik and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05607277 (Global Iliac Branch Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05607277 completednot on this map

Global Iliac Branch Study (Iliac Conformability Paper, Gore vs. Cook)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2014 to 2021Enrolled297ConditionsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Iliac AneurysmArmsEndovascular Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 351 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Prediction model for aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, and peripheral artery disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  12. Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  13. A nine-month survival following rupture of a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm without repair.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Value-Based Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

US Preventive Services Task Force
Douglas K OwensVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Karina W DavidsonFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.
Alex H KristFairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia.
Michael J BarryHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael CabanaUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Aaron B CaugheyOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Chyke A DoubeniMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John W EplingVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke.
Martha KubikTemple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
C Seth LandefeldUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Carol M MangioneUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Lori PbertUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Michael SilversteinBoston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Melissa A SimonNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Chien-Wen TsengUniversity of Hawaii, Honolulu.
John B WongTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMayo Clinic · USNorthwell Health · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCarilion Clinic · USOregon Health & Science University · USTufts University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is typically defined as aortic enlargement with a diameter of 3.0 cm or larger. The prevalence of AAA has declined over the past 2 decades among screened men 65 years or older in various European countries. The current prevalence of AAA in the United States is unclear because of the low uptake of screening. Most AAAs are asymptomatic until they rupture. Although the risk for rupture varies greatly by aneurysm size, the associated risk for death with rupture is as high as 81%. Objective: To update its 2014 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a review of the evidence on the effectiveness of 1-time and repeated screening for AAA, the associated harms of screening, and the benefits and harms of available treatments for small AAAs (3.0-5.4 cm in diameter) identified through screening. Population: This recommendation applies to asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. However, the randomized trial evidence focuses almost entirely on men aged 65 to 75 years. Evidence Assessment: Based on a review of the evidence, the USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for AAA in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked is of moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for AAA in men aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked is of small net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the net benefit of screening for AAA in women aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked or have a family history of AAA. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of screening for AAA in women aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA outweigh the benefits. Recommendations: The USPSTF recommends 1-time screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends that clinicians selectively offer screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked rather than routinely screening all men in this group. (C recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for AAA with ultrasonography in women who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA. (D recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AAA with ultrasonography in women aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked or have a family history of AAA. (I statement).

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsSmokingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31821437
OpenAlexW2995034229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.