GuidelineJAMA2019
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Guideline in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05607277 (Global Iliac Branch Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Global Iliac Branch Study (Iliac Conformability Paper, Gore vs. Cook)
Who cites it
163 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 351 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving dynamic needs for patient-reported outcomes assessment in individuals with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): A systematic review.Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Identifying abdominal aortic aneurysm size and presence using Natural Language Processing of radiology reports: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Guideline
- Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Guideline
- 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Guideline
- Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A comparison of women and men with small abdominal aortic aneurysms.The British journal of surgery · 2025Trial
- Long Chain Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Improve Vascular Stiffness in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- Discrepancies in low-value practices across cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. A narrative review.The European journal of general practice · 2026Review
- Prediction model for aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, and peripheral artery disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Review
- A nine-month survival following rupture of a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm without repair.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Gut microbe-generated metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a cohort study.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Family screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Vascular Disease Prospective-Retrospective Observational Registry for Aortic Aneurysm and Peripheral Artery Disease in Korea: Study Rationale and Methodology.Vascular specialist international · 2026Article
- Value-Based Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Does one size fit all? Screening implications for abdominal aortic aneurysms in women.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- TotalSegmentator-AI for aortic segmentation in CT: Reliable performance in normal anatomy but limited utility in pathological aortic disease.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- The Global Burden of Aortic Aneurysm and Its Attributable Risk Factors, 1990-2021: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Health science reports · 2026Article
103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- SummaryForPatientsIn
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is typically defined as aortic enlargement with a diameter of 3.0 cm or larger. The prevalence of AAA has declined over the past 2 decades among screened men 65 years or older in various European countries. The current prevalence of AAA in the United States is unclear because of the low uptake of screening. Most AAAs are asymptomatic until they rupture. Although the risk for rupture varies greatly by aneurysm size, the associated risk for death with rupture is as high as 81%. Objective: To update its 2014 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a review of the evidence on the effectiveness of 1-time and repeated screening for AAA, the associated harms of screening, and the benefits and harms of available treatments for small AAAs (3.0-5.4 cm in diameter) identified through screening. Population: This recommendation applies to asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. However, the randomized trial evidence focuses almost entirely on men aged 65 to 75 years. Evidence Assessment: Based on a review of the evidence, the USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for AAA in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked is of moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for AAA in men aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked is of small net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the net benefit of screening for AAA in women aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked or have a family history of AAA. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of screening for AAA in women aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA outweigh the benefits. Recommendations: The USPSTF recommends 1-time screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends that clinicians selectively offer screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked rather than routinely screening all men in this group. (C recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for AAA with ultrasonography in women who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA. (D recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AAA with ultrasonography in women aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked or have a family history of AAA. (I statement).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.