Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31821359›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Optimizing sgRNA length to improve target specificity and efficiency for the GGTA1 gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system.

Anders W Matson, Nora Hosny, Zachary A Swanson, Bernhard J Hering, Christopher Burlak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. CRISPR-mediated targeting of theMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Enhanced editing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluate the guide RNA effectivenessFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Analysis of off-target effects in CRISPR-based gene drives in the human malaria mosquito.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. [Construction of macrophage RAW 264.7 cells withNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021
    Article
  15. HLA-G1Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Ethical considerations of gene editing and genetic selection.Journal of general and family medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anders W MatsonSchulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-5822
Nora HosnySchulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Zachary A SwansonSchulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2580-2865
Bernhard J HeringSchulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Christopher BurlakSchulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
University of Minnesota · USSuez Canal University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system has enhanced the development of genetically engineered animals for use in xenotransplantation. Potential limitations to the CRISPR/Cas9 system impacting the development of genetically engineered cells and animals include the creation of off-target mutations. We sought to develop a method to reduce the likelihood of off-target mutation while maintaining a high efficiency rate of desired genetic mutations for the GGTA1 gene. Extension of sgRNA length, responsible for recognition of the target DNA sequence for Cas9 cleavage, resulted in improved specificity for the GGTA1 gene and less off-target DNA cleavage. Three PAM sites were selected within exon 1 of the porcine GGTA1 gene and ten sgRNA of variable lengths were designed across these three sites. The sgRNA was tested against synthetic double stranded DNA templates replicating both the native GGTA1 DNA template and the two most likely off-target binding sites in the porcine genome. Cleavage ability for native and off-target DNA was determined by in vitro cleavage assays. Resulting cleavage products were analyzed to determine the cleavage efficiency of the Cas9/sgRNA complex. Extension of sgRNA length did not have a statistical impact on the specificity of the Cas9/sgRNA complex for PAM1 and PAM2 sites. At the PAM3 site, however, an observed increase in specificity for native versus off-target templates was seen with increased sgRNA length. In addition, distance between PAM site and the start codon had a significant impact on cleavage efficiency and target specificity, regardless of sgRNA length. Although the in vitro assays showed off-target cleavage, Sanger sequencing revealed that no off-target mutations were found in GGTA1 knockout cell lines or piglet. These results demonstrate an optimized method for improvement of the CRIPSR/Cas9 gene editing system by reducing the likelihood of damaging off-target mutations in GGTA1 knocked out cells destined for xenotransplant donor production.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNADNA CleavageGalactosyltransferasesGene EditingRibonucleoproteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSwinealpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase 1, porcineDNAGalactosyltransferasesRibonucleoproteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID31821359
PMCPMC6903732
OpenAlexW2995580622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.