ArticlePloS one2019
Optimizing sgRNA length to improve target specificity and efficiency for the GGTA1 gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas9 in Cancer Therapy: Overcoming Delivery Barriers and Off-Target Effects for Clinical Translation.Health science reports · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: technological advances, delivery strategies and precision engineering of primary cells for therapeutic application in genetic disorders and diabetes mellitus.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- CRISPR-mediated targeting of theMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Enhanced editing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- The Strategy and Application of Gene Attenuation in Metabolic Engineering.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Targeted Integration of siRNA against Porcine Cytomegalovirus (PCMV) Enhances the Resistance of Porcine Cells to PCMV.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Recent Advancements in Reducing the Off-Target Effect of CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2024Review
- Usefulness of current sgRNA design guidelines and in vitro cleavage assays for plant CRISPR/Cas genome editing: a case targeting the polyphenol oxidase gene family in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.).Transgenic research · 2023Article
- VarLOCK: sequencing-independent, rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern for point-of-care testing, qPCR pipelines and national wastewater surveillance.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CRISPR-Associated Transposase for Targeted Mutagenesis in Diverse Proteobacteria.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Targeting miRNA by CRISPR/Cas in cancer: advantages and challenges.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
- Evaluate the guide RNA effectivenessFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Analysis of off-target effects in CRISPR-based gene drives in the human malaria mosquito.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- [Construction of macrophage RAW 264.7 cells withNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Article
- HLA-G1Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Optimizing sgRNA to Improve CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Efficiency: Special Focus on Human and Animal Cell.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 Gene-Editing in Cancer Immunotherapy: Promoting the Present Revolution in Cancer Therapy and Exploring More.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Versatile in vitro assay to recognize Cas9-induced mutations.Plant direct · 2020Article
- Review
- Ethical considerations of gene editing and genetic selection.Journal of general and family medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system has enhanced the development of genetically engineered animals for use in xenotransplantation. Potential limitations to the CRISPR/Cas9 system impacting the development of genetically engineered cells and animals include the creation of off-target mutations. We sought to develop a method to reduce the likelihood of off-target mutation while maintaining a high efficiency rate of desired genetic mutations for the GGTA1 gene. Extension of sgRNA length, responsible for recognition of the target DNA sequence for Cas9 cleavage, resulted in improved specificity for the GGTA1 gene and less off-target DNA cleavage. Three PAM sites were selected within exon 1 of the porcine GGTA1 gene and ten sgRNA of variable lengths were designed across these three sites. The sgRNA was tested against synthetic double stranded DNA templates replicating both the native GGTA1 DNA template and the two most likely off-target binding sites in the porcine genome. Cleavage ability for native and off-target DNA was determined by in vitro cleavage assays. Resulting cleavage products were analyzed to determine the cleavage efficiency of the Cas9/sgRNA complex. Extension of sgRNA length did not have a statistical impact on the specificity of the Cas9/sgRNA complex for PAM1 and PAM2 sites. At the PAM3 site, however, an observed increase in specificity for native versus off-target templates was seen with increased sgRNA length. In addition, distance between PAM site and the start codon had a significant impact on cleavage efficiency and target specificity, regardless of sgRNA length. Although the in vitro assays showed off-target cleavage, Sanger sequencing revealed that no off-target mutations were found in GGTA1 knockout cell lines or piglet. These results demonstrate an optimized method for improvement of the CRIPSR/Cas9 gene editing system by reducing the likelihood of damaging off-target mutations in GGTA1 knocked out cells destined for xenotransplant donor production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.