Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31821355›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

A single intra-articular injection of 2.0% non-chemically modified sodium hyaluronate vs 0.8% hylan G-F 20 in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: A 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial.

Emmanuel Maheu, Bernard Avouac, Renée Liliane Dreiser, Thomas Bardin

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel MaheuDepartment of Rheumatology, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France, Private office, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6615-3630
Bernard AvouacDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France (currently: rheumatologist, consultant, Paris, France).
Renée Liliane DreiserDepartment of Rheumatology, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Thomas BardinDepartment of Rheumatology, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a single intra-articular injection of 2.0% non-chemically modified sodium hyaluronate (SH) vs 0.8% hylan G-F 20 (control) in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

designThis was a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial conducted in patients with painful tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (American College of Rheumatology criteria) with insufficient response or intolerance to first-line analgesics and regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Subjects received a single intra-articular injection of either SH or hylan G-F 20. The primary outcome was the 6-month change from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale (WOMAC A), with a pre-specified lower margin for non-inferiority of 8 mm.

resultsOf the 292 patients randomized (SH: 144), 288 received an injection (SH: 142), 266 completed the study (SH: 134). In the Per Protocol dataset (SH: 113, control: 112), the WOMAC A change at 6 months was -34.3 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): -37.8, -30.8) and -36.2 mm (95% CI: -40.3, -32.1) for the SH and hylan G-F 20 patients, respectively (P = 0.5). The intergroup difference was -1.9 mm (95% CI: -7.3, 3.5). Results were similar in the Full Analysis Set (SH: 139, control: 141) with a difference between the groups of -2.9 mm (95% CI: -7.9, 2.2). A total of 31.3% of the injected patients reported a treatment-emergent adverse event, including injection site reactions (pain, inflammation or effusion) which occurred in 8.5% of the SH patients vs 13.0% of the hylan G-F 20 patients. No serious reactions were reported.

conclusionsThis clinical trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of a single intra-articular injection of SH vs hylan G-F 20 on the WOMAC A change from baseline at 6 months.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic Acidhylan

Identifiers

PMID31821355
PMCPMC6903764
OpenAlexW2995180944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.