Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820833›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2020

Robust estimation of the causal effect of time-varying neighborhood factors on health outcomes.

Michael W Robbins, Beth Ann Griffin, Regina A Shih, Mary Ellen Slaughter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael W RobbinsRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-1733
Beth Ann GriffinRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Regina A ShihRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Mary Ellen SlaughterRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

Funding

Objective and Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics and Cognitive DeclineR01AG043960 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI SHIH, REGINA A · 2012 to 2014
$2.7M
Improving Causal Inference Tools for Addiction ResearchersR01DA045049 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI GRIFFIN, BETH ANN, MCCAFFREY, DANIEL F · 2018 to 2020
$2.4M
Data Fusion for Predicting Long-term Program ImpactsR21AG058123 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI ROBBINS, MICHAEL · 2018 to 2019
$381k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043960NIA NIH HHS R01AG043960NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058123NIA NIH HHS R21AG058123NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045049NIDA NIH HHS R01DA045049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental difficulty of establishing causal relationships between an exposure and an outcome in observational data involves disentangling causality from confounding factors. This problem underlies much of neighborhoods research, which abounds with studies that consider associations between neighborhood characteristics and health outcomes in longitudinal data. Such analyses are confounded by selection issues; individuals with above average health outcomes (or associated characteristics) may self-select into advantaged neighborhoods. Techniques commonly used to assess causal inferences in observational longitudinal data, such as inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), may be inappropriate in neighborhoods data due to unique characteristics of such data. We advance the IPTW toolkit by introducing a procedure based on a multivariate kernel density function which is more appropriate for neighborhoods data. The proposed weighting method is applied in conjunction with a marginal structural model. Our empirical analyses use longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study; our exposure of interest is an index of neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES), and we examine its influence on cognitive function. Our findings illustrate the importance of the choice of method for IPTW-the comparison weighting methods provide poor balance across the set of covariates (which is not the case for our preferred procedure) and yield misleading results when applied in the outcomes models. The utility of the multivariate kernel is also validated via simulation. In addition, our findings emphasize the importance of IPTW-controlling for covariates within a regression without IPTW indicates that NSES affects cognition, whereas IPTW-weighted models fail to show a statistically significant effect.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalOutcome Assessment, Health CareCausalityHumansProbabilityTime Factorscausalitydoubly robustinverse probability of treatment weightingkernel densitylongitudinalneighborhood

Identifiers

PMID31820833
PMCPMC9706720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.