Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820528›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2020

Nonlinear analysis of EEG complexity in episode and remission phase of recurrent depression.

Milena Čukić, Miodrag Stokić, Slavoljub Radenković, Miloš Ljubisavljević, Slobodan Simić, Danka Savić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical Sensitivity of Fractal Neurodynamics.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  16. [Applications and challenges of wearable electroencephalogram signals in depression recognition and personalized music intervention].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milena ČukićDepartment of General Physiology and Biophysics, School of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Miodrag StokićCognitive Neuroscience Department, Life Activities Advancement Center, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9095-5286
Slavoljub RadenkovićDivision for Back-End Development, TomTom, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Miloš LjubisavljevićDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Slobodan SimićDepartment for Forensic Psychiatry, Institute for Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Danka SavićLaboratory of Theoretical and Condensed Matter Physics 020/2, Vinča Institute, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBiomarkers of major depressive disorder (MDD), its phases and forms have long been sought. Objectives were to examine whether the complexity of EEG activity, measured by Higuchi's fractal dimension (HFD) and sample entropy (SampEn), differs between healthy subjects, patients in remission, and in episode phase of the recurrent depression and whether the changes are differentially distributed between hemispheres and cortical regions.

methodsResting state EEG with eyes closed was recorded from 22 patients suffering from recurrent depression (11 in remission, 11 in the episode), and 20 age and sex-matched healthy control subjects. Artifact-free EEG epochs were analyzed by in-house developed programs running HFD and SampEn algorithms.

resultsDepressed patients had higher HFD and SampEn complexity compared to healthy subjects. The complexity was higher in patients who were in remission than in those in the acute episode. Altered complexity was present in the frontal and centro-parietal regions when compared to control group. The complexity in frontal and parietal regions differed between the two phases of depressive disorder.

conclusionsComplexity measures of EEG distinguish between the healthy controls, patients in remission and episode. Further studies are needed to establish whether these measures carry a potential to aid clinically relevant decisions about depression.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAdultAgedElectroencephalographyEntropyFemaleFractalsFrontal LobeFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedParietal LobePrincipal Component AnalysisRecurrencecomplexityelectroencephalogramHiguchi's fractal dimensionrecurrent depressionsample entropy

Identifiers

PMID31820528
PMCPMC7301286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.