Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820416›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Meeting the Information and Support Needs of Blood Cancer Patients and Caregivers: A Longitudinal Study of a Model of Patient-Centered Information Delivery.

Katherine Treiman, Caroline Husick, Nikie Sarris-Esquivel, Maria Sae-Hau, Meredith Barnhart, Kate Disare, Catherine Gupta, Michael Halpern, Kara Suvada, Elisa Weiss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine TreimanRTI International, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD, 20852-3907, USA. KTreiman@rti.org.
Caroline HusickRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Nikie Sarris-EsquivelRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Maria Sae-HauThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, 3 International Drive, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY, 10573, USA.
Meredith BarnhartThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, 3 International Drive, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY, 10573, USA.
Kate DisareThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, 3 International Drive, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY, 10573, USA.
Catherine GuptaRTI Health Solutions, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Michael HalpernDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Room 3E4342, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
Kara SuvadaRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Elisa WeissThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, 3 International Drive, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY, 10573, USA.
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society · USRTI International · USNational Cancer Institute · USRTI Health Solutions · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to reliable, up-to-date information and resources can assist individuals managing and living with cancer. The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, through its Information Resource Center, provides personalized information and support to individuals affected by blood cancer. To examine its value and impact, we conducted qualitative interviews (n = 18) and an online survey of patients and caregivers (N = 515) after they talked with an Information Resource Center Information Specialist by phone, with a follow-up survey about 6 months later. Respondents most commonly contacted the Information Resource Center to get referrals to support programs (40.4%) and to obtain information about getting a second opinion (36.5%) and financial assistance (36.2%). After talking with an Information Specialist, respondents felt more hopeful (85.9%), more confident in managing care (82.9%), and more knowledgeable about their diagnosis (49.5%) and financial resources (42.4%). After speaking with an Information Specialist, respondents changed how they advocated for themselves/loved one (23.8%), changed how they communicated with doctors/other providers and family/friends (both 15.9%), received financial assistance (22.2%), and took other actions. Among respondents who took actions, most said that the conversation(s) had positively impacted the action. Respondents who spoke with an Information Specialist more than once were more likely to report positive impacts, including changing how they advocate for themselves/loved one and communicate with providers (both p < 0.05). Respondents diagnosed more recently were also more likely to report positive impact, including changing the way they communicate with providers (p < 0.05). Findings highlight the value of cancer helplines and suggest ways they can be most effective.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsFriendsHumansLongitudinal StudiesPatient-Centered CareCancer helplineCancer information needsCancer information, support, and resourcesCancer patients and caregiversLeukemia and lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID31820416
OpenAlexW2995072517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.