Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820324›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Constructional apraxia from the roots up: Kleist, Strauss, and their contemporaries.

Luigi Trojano

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luigi TrojanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy. luigi.trojano@unicampania.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-9642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept and the term of constructional apraxia have been proposed by Karl Kleist and described in his impressive book "Gehirnpathologie", published in 1934. However, the first ever paper under the heading of constructional apraxia was written by Hans Strauss, one of Kleist's pupils, and published in 1924. Nowadays, the term constructional apraxia is still in use to refer to all disorders observed in drawing and assembling activities; its assessment, performed as it was in early studies, is part of common practice in behavioral neurology and neuropsychology. Nonetheless, the concept and the neural underpinnings of constructional apraxia have been deeply revisited with respect to the original proposal. Modern studies demonstrated that drawing and assembling are based on very large and complex brain networks extending in both hemispheres, including the left angular gyrus (as hypothesized by Kleist) but well beyond the original ideas about localization of constructional apraxia. From a clinical point of view, constructional apraxia has poor localizing value but provides valuable diagnostic information for conditions of cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

AdultApraxiasHistory, 20th CenturyHumansSpace PerceptionApraxiaClosing-inConstructional apraxiaHistory of neurology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.