ArticleThe AAPS journal2019
Deconvolution Analysis by Non-linear Regression Using a Convolution-Based Model: Comparison of Nonparametric and Parametric Approaches.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Models in Oncology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Discriminative Power of the Flow through Cell Dissolution Tester in Predicting the In Vivo Performance of Pentoxifylline SR Product under Fed and Fasting Conditions.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Article
- Inferring pulmonary exposure based on clinical PK data: accuracy and precision of model-based deconvolution methods.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2022Article
- Modeling Complex Pharmacokinetics of Long-Acting Injectable Products Using Convolution-Based Models With Nonparametric Input Functions.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- Screening of Bioequivalent Extended-Release Formulations for Metformin by Principal Component Analysis and Convolution-Based IVIVC Approach.The AAPS journal · 2021Article
- Comparison of Alternative Population Modeling Approaches for Implementing a Level A IVIVC and for Assessing the Time-Scaling Factor Using Deconvolution and Convolution-Based Methods.The AAPS journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The convolution-based modeling approach has been shown to be flexible and easy to implement for performing a deconvolution analysis and for assessing in vitro/in vivo correlation using non-linear regression and a pre-specified model describing the in vivo drug absorption. A generalization of this method has been developed using a nonparametric description of the in vivo drug absorption process in replacement of a model-based definition. A comparison of the parametric and nonparametric deconvolution and convolution analyses was conducted on the pharmacokinetic (PK) data observed in four published studies after the administration of an extended-release formulation of methylphenidate at the dose of 18 mg. All the analyses were conducted using a conventional non-linear regression software (NONMEM). The results of the deconvolution analysis indicated that the parametric and nonparametric approaches performed similarly. The parametric approach described the input function using a double Weibull equation (6 parameters) while the nonparametric approach described the input function using a piecewise approximation (12-13 parameters). The validation of the results of the deconvolution analysis was conducted by comparing observed and predicted PK concentrations by the convolution analysis. The performance of the parametric and nonparametric approaches for assessing deconvolution was evaluated using the Akaike and the Bayesian information criteria. These criteria indicated that, despite the similar results obtained with the two approaches, the nonparametric approach provided better results. In conclusion, these results indicated that the nonparametric approach should be considered as the preferred approach for conducting a deconvolution analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31820258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.