Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820230›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Investigations on the phytotoxicity of perfluorooctanoic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Lingling Fan, Jie Tang, Danfeng Zhang, Mingyue Ma, Yu Wang, Yi Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lingling FanSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Bio-process, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China.
Jie TangSchool of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China.
Danfeng ZhangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Bio-process, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China.
Mingyue MaSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Bio-process, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China.
Yu WangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Bio-process, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China.
Yi HanSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Bio-process, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China. yi.han@hfut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-1485
Hefei University of Technology · CNAnhui Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities PA2017GDQT0018Project of Recruiting and Stabilize Qualified Personnel of Anhui Agricultural University WD 2018-10Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province (CN) KJ201 6A234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental contamination by perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has raised concerns for years. Yet, little information on its phytotoxic effects and underlying mechanisms in higher plants is available. To this end, comparative analyses of the responses to PFOA exposure between shoots and roots in the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana were performed at the physiological and molecular levels. Our results showed that PFOA exposure reduced Arabidopsis biomass in a dose-related manner, and shoot growth was more sensitive to PFOA than root growth. Consistently, PFOA accumulation and the levels of several metal elements, including Zn, Ca, Cu, and K, in addition to Fe, were more substantially affected in the shoots than in the roots. Transcriptomic analysis further showed that the shoot transcriptional profile was distinguishable from that of roots upon PFOA exposure. Nevertheless, some overlapping genes were present between the shoots and roots, mainly including transporter genes, Fe-deficiency-responsive genes, and oxidative stress-related genes. More importantly, a comparative analysis of ROS-associated genes in combination with other oxidative stress assays pointed out that PFOA triggered certain oxidative stress-associated events more strongly in shoots than in roots. Overall, the results demonstrated that PFOA exposure caused alterations in PFOA distribution, metal element balance, reconfiguration of transcriptomes, and induction of oxidative stress in a tissue-dependent manner in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCaprylatesFluorocarbonsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantMetalsTranscriptomeArabidopsis ProteinsCaprylatesFluorocarbonsMetalsperfluorooctanoic acidArabidopsis thalianaGene expressionMetal elementsOxidative stressPFOA exposureRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID31820230
OpenAlexW2993145082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.