Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820219›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020

Employment in Personality Disorders and the Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support: Outcomes from a Secondary Data Analysis.

T T Juurlink, F Lamers, H J F van Marle, H Michon, J T van Busschbach, A T F Beekman, J R Anema

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The societal cost of treatment-seeking patients with borderline personality disorder in Germany.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

T T JuurlinkPsychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.juurlink@ggzingeest.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1801-4067
F LamersPsychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H J F van MarlePsychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H MichonTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J T van BusschbachUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University Center of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A T F BeekmanPsychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J R AnemaSocial Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGZ inGeest · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLTrimbos Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Personality disorders (PDs) are associated with severe functional impairment and subsequent high societal costs, increasing the need to improve occupational functioning in PD. Individual placement and support (IPS) is an effective, evidence-based method of supported employment, which so far has been tested in various mixed patient populations with severe mental illness (SMI, including PDs). However, the effectiveness of IPS for PDs per se remains uninvestigated. Methods Data from the SCION trial were used, including 31 SMI patients with PDs and 115 SMI patients with other primary diagnoses (primarily psychotic disorders). First, the interaction effect of diagnosis (PD vs other SMI) and intervention (IPS vs traditional vocational rehabilitation) was studied. Second, in the IPS condition, difference between diagnostic groups in time to first job was studied. Results We did not find evidence of a moderating effect of PD diagnosis on the primary effect of IPS (proportion who started in regular employment) (OR = 0.592, 95% CI 0.80-4.350, p = 0.606) after 30 months. Also, PD diagnosis did not moderate the effect of time until first job in IPS. Conclusions From the present explorative analysis we did not find evidence for a moderating effect of PD diagnosis on the effectiveness of IPS among PD participants. This indicates that IPS could be as effective in gaining employment in participants with PD as it is in participants with other SMI. Future studies, implementing larger numbers, should confirm whether IPS is equally effective in PDs and study whether augmentations or alterations to the standard IPS model might be beneficiary for PD.

Indexed as

AdultEmployment, SupportedFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPersonality DisordersPersons with DisabilitiesRehabilitation, VocationalEmploymentIndividual placement and supportNetherlandsPersonality disorderSecondary analysis

Identifiers

PMID31820219
PMCPMC7293674
OpenAlexW2994494788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.