Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820218›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2020

Association of Opioid Overdose Risk Factors and Naloxone Prescribing in US Adults.

Lewei Allison Lin, Chad M Brummett, Jennifer F Waljee, Michael J Englesbe, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Amy S B Bohnert

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Opioid-induced respiratory depression and risk factors in a tertiary hospital: A retrospective study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Opioids and obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Prescribing Naloxone to High-Risk Patients in the Emergency Department: Is it Enough?Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lewei Allison LinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. leweil@med.umich.edu.
Chad M BrummettMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jennifer F WaljeeMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael J EnglesbeMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vidhya GunaseelanMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amy S B BohnertDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · US

Funding

oPIOIDS: Prevention of Iatrogenic Opioid Dependence after SurgeryR01DA042859 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRUMMETT, CHAD M, WALJEE, JENNIFER FILIP · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Using telehealth to expand treatment access for Veterans with opioid use disorderIK2HX002612 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI LIN, LEWEI ALLISON · 2019 to 2024
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002612NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing naloxone to patients is a key strategy to prevent opioid overdoses, but little is known about the reach of naloxone prescribing.

objectiveDetermine patient factors associated with receiving naloxone and trends over time in patients with key overdose risk factors.

designRetrospective observational study.

participantsUsing the Clinformatics DataMart, a US-wide health insurance claims dataset, we compared adults who received opioids and naloxone (opioid+naloxone) from January 2014 to June 2017 with adults who received opioids without naloxone (opioids only), matched on gender, age ± 5 years, month/year of opioid fill, and number of opioid claims. MAIN MEASURES: Key patient-level opioid overdose risk factors included receipt of high-dosage opioids, concurrent benzodiazepines, history of opioid and other substance use disorders, and history of opioid overdose.

resultsWe included 3963 opioid+naloxone and 19,815 opioid only patients. Key factors associated with naloxone fills included high opioid daily dosage (50 to < 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME): AOR = 2.43, 95% CI 2.15-2.76 and ≥ 90 MME: AOR = 3.94, 95% CI 3.47-4.46; reference: < 50 MME), receiving concurrent benzodiazepines (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.38), and having a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (AOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.40-1.73). History of opioid overdose was not associated with naloxone (AOR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.15). The percent of patients receiving naloxone increased, yet less than 2% of patients in any of the key overdose risk factor groups received naloxone by the last 6 months of the study period.

conclusionsNaloxone prescribing has increased and was more likely to be co-prescribed to patients with some risk factors for overdose. However, overall prescribing remains minimal. Additional efforts are needed across health systems to increase naloxone prescribing for patients at risk for opioid overdose.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsRisk FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsnaloxoneopioidsopioid use disorder: overdose prevention

Identifiers

PMID31820218
PMCPMC7018930
OpenAlexW2992516960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.