Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820094›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Navigated percutaneous versus open pedicle screw implantation using intraoperative CT and robotic cone-beam CT imaging.

Dimitri Tkatschenko, Paul Kendlbacher, Marcus Czabanka, Georg Bohner, Peter Vajkoczy, Nils Hecht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Revealing the potential: radiological assessment of pedicle screw placement in the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating a cutting-edge augmented reality-supported navigation system for spinal instrumentation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intraoperative imaging and navigated spinopelvic instrumentation: S2-alar-iliac screws combined with tricortical S1 pedicle screw fixation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitri TkatschenkoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Paul KendlbacherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus CzabankaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Georg BohnerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter VajkoczyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. peter.vajkoczy@charite.de.
Nils HechtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9989-649X
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePercutaneous paraspinal pedicle screw implantation (PPSI) reduces soft tissue trauma, blood loss, and postoperative pain but remains technically challenging and associated with radiation exposure and implant-related artefacts. Here, we determined the feasibility, screw accessibility, and the accuracy of navigated PPSI in the thoraco-lumbar sacral spine using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) and robotic cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging.

methodsBetween 2015 and 2018, 465 percutaneous paraspinal pedicle screws were implanted in 75 patients using iCT- or CBCT-based spinal navigation with 230 screws connected to rod reducers during screw assessment imaging (iCT 198; CBCT 32). Clinical and demographic data, intraoperative screw accessibility, and screw accuracy were analyzed and compared to a case-matched cohort of 75 patients undergoing navigated implantation of 481 pedicle screws through an open midline approach.

resultsBoth iCT and CBCT permitted reliable assessment of each implanted screw, regardless of artifacts caused by rod reducers. Although overall accuracy for correct placement was comparable between PPSI and open surgery (PPSI 96.6%; Open 94.2%), PPSI compared favorably to open surgery regarding complete placement within the pedicle (PPSI 90.1%; Open 75.1%; p  <  0.0001), regional placement accuracy in the lumbar (PPSI 97.8%; Open 91.5%; p  <  0.001), and lumbar-sacral spine (PPSI 100%; Open 81.2%; p  <  0.05), next to the duration of surgery and length of hospitalization.

conclusionsPPSI with iCT- and CBCT-based spinal navigation improves the accuracy, safety, and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation. Next, a cost-effectiveness and outcome analysis should determine whether iCT and CBCT imaging are truly economically justified. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpinal FusionSurgery, Computer-AssistedAgedCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedIntraoperative 3D imagingMinimally invasive spine surgeryPedicle screw accuracyPercutaneous paraspinal pedicle screw implantationSpinal navigation

Identifiers

PMID31820094
OpenAlexW2993544672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.