Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820079›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Optical coherence tomography angiography-derived flow density: a review of the influencing factors.

Viktoria C Brücher, Jens J Storp, Nicole Eter, Maged Alnawaiseh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optical coherence tomography angiography suggests choriocapillaris perfusion deficit as etiology of acute macular neuroretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  10. Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative OCT angiography measurements from table-top and portable Flex Spectralis devices.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors affecting optical coherence tomography angiography signal strength index in patients receiving intravitreal injection treatment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Tafluprost on Ocular Blood Flow.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Viktoria C BrücherDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany. viktoria.bruecher@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5536-8043
Jens J StorpDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Nicole EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Maged AlnawaisehDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research interest in the possibility of quantifying macular and optic nerve head perfusion through optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is rapidly advancing. Numerous scientific trials have furthered our understanding of the capabilities and the limitations of this novel technology, while applying OCTA to various ocular pathologies. In recent years, different parameters such as age, gender, intraocular pressure, spherical equivalent, physical activity, systemic diseases, and medication have been shown to have a significant impact on quantitative OCTA metrics. Since OCTA is likely to remain a "hot topic" in the near future, it is crucial to be aware of influencing factors in order to ensure correct interpretation of imaging results. This article reviews the factors currently known to influence flow density (FD) as measured by OCTA in healthy eyes.

Indexed as

Fluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureOptic DiskRegional Blood FlowRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceFlow densityInfluencing factorOCTAOptical coherence tomography angiographyRetinal microcirculation

Identifiers

PMID31820079
OpenAlexW2995226255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.