Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820059›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Effectiveness of Topical Insulin Dressings in Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Mehreen K Bhettani, Mubarik Rehman, Humera N Altaf, Omar S Altaf

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insulin Topical Application for Wound Healing in Nondiabetic Patients.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Topical Insulin on Wound Healing: A Review of Animal and Human Evidences.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehreen K BhettaniPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Mubarik RehmanShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Pitrus Bokhari Road H-8/4, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Humera N AltafShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Pitrus Bokhari Road H-8/4, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan. humeraaltaaf@gmail.com.
Omar S AltafTehsil Headquarter Hospital Hazro, Hazro Tehsil, Attock District, 43440, Pakistan.
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University · PKPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfected diabetic foot ulcers are always a problem for the surgeon, as well as, an economic burden upon the patient and state, in terms of increased hospital stay and cost of medications and dressings. Various methods have been devised for the treatment of infected wounds in history with varying results in different patients groups. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of topical insulin on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers with the conventional Pyodine MATERIALS AND

methodsIt was a quasi-experimental study done at Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad over a period of 20 months from January 2015 to September 2016. One hundred ten patients were included in the study. Sampling technique used was non-probability consecutive. Patients were assigned into two groups, group A receiving treatment with solution of 30 International Units Insulin Regular in 30 ml of normal saline and group B receiving conventional dressing with normal saline. The wound were compared for both groups at the days 7, 14 and 21 for wound healing. Complete healing time of diabetic foot ulcers was determined from patients' followup visits in outpatient department. Data was by analyzed by SPSS 20.

resultsA total of 110 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided equally into both control and experimental groups. The mean age of the patients was 53.23 ± 6.21 years. The mean pre-treatment wound diameter was 4.81 ± 0.85 cm in the placebo group, while it was 4.84 ± 0.81 cm in the topical insulin group (CI 0.29-0.35, P = 0.875). The mean post-treatment wound diameter was 3.90 ± 0.76 cm in the placebo group, while it was 2.46 ± 0.57 cm in the topical insulin group (CI 0.44-0.58, P = 0.022). The mean wound difference was 0.91 ± 0.25 cm in the placebo group, while it was 2.4 ± 0.34 cm in the topical insulin group (CI 0.40-0.20, P = 0.041). The mean percent reduction in wound diameter was 19.2 ± 4.6% in the placebo group, while it was 49.7 ± 5.2% cm in the topical insulin group (CI 10.6-6.1, P = 0.001).

conclusionThere was significant contraction seen in the size of the ulcer in both the study groups depicting the healing process.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBandagesDiabetic FootFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMiddle AgedPovidone-IodineWound HealingAnti-Infective Agents, LocalHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinPovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID31820059
OpenAlexW2994543761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.