Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31820011›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2020

[Hospital nursing personnel staffing and patient outcome].

T Schmitz-Rixen, R T Grundmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. [Between care for others and self-care: intensive care nursing in times of the COVID-19 pandemic].Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T Schmitz-RixenKlinik für Gefäß- und Endovascularchirurgie und des Universitären Wundzentrums, Klinikum der Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland. Schmitz-Rixen@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
R T GrundmannDeutsches Institut für Gefäßmedizinische Gesundheitsforschung (DIGG), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin, In den Grüben 144, 84489, Burghausen, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this review is to comment on the association between hospital nursing personnel staffing and patient outcomes, including the avoidance of errors and complications.

methodsA literature search was carried out in the Medline database on publications from the last 10 years on nursing personnel staffing.

resultsOnly overviews and observational studies on the topic were available and no controlled or prospective surveys. Most investigators assumed that there was an inverse relationship between low nursing staff levels of hospital wards and intensive care and adverse outcomes, including higher mortality rates; however, there is no clear significance for this assumption and evidence-based definitive lower limits for nursing staff cannot be given due to a lack of randomized trials. The causes for unfavorable results in the case of inadequate nursing personnel staffing include hygiene deficiencies, orders not followed and unfulfilled nursing and monitoring measures. Furthermore, staff overload leads to staff dissatisfaction and burnout, which also has a negative impact on the results. Most studies required a maximum patient to nurse ratio of 2:1 for the intensive care unit and an average ratio of not more than 8:1 for surgical wards. With respect to these requirements, changing personnel needs must be considered depending on the current state of the patients being cared for, which enabled all investigators to require a flexible roster design; approval for fixed statutory lower limits for nursing staff was low. The level of education of the nursing staff also played an essential role as qualified nursing staff cannot be replaced at will by less qualified assistant staff.

conclusionThe level of training and the number of the nursing personnel influence hospital mortality and adverse outcomes; however, there are no evidence-based lower levels for nursing staff for inpatient care and perhaps this cannot be the case due to the changing complexity of the patients admitted, the comorbidities and possible treatment complications. There is a considerable need for research.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingProspective StudiesHospital mortalityHospital wardIntensive careMandatory regulationsNurse staffing

Identifiers

PMID31820011
OpenAlexW2993566327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.