ArticleCureus2019
Cost Savings and Efficacy in Management of Paracetamol Poisoning in a 23-hours Emergency Department Observation Unit: A Comparison to Inpatient Care.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Emergency department observation units (EDOU) have been shown to be effective in decreasing hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) for various conditions. However, cost savings and efficacy in the management of poisoning in EDOU have not been widely studied. The objective of our study is to compare the costs and effectiveness of managing paracetamol poisoned patients in the EDOU with those treated in the inpatient wards. Methods We conducted a historical controlled observational study comparing paracetamol-poisoned patients (who received at least 21 hours of IV N-acetylcysteine [NAC]) admitted to the EDOU during 2013-2014 with similar patients admitted to inpatient ward during 2011, 2013-2014. Results We found 136 patients admitted to the inpatient ward and 95 to our EDOU due to paracetamol poisoning but only 78 and 39 patients respectively fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Between the EDOU and inpatient ward groups, we found similar demographics, poisoning presentation, treatment, and adverse event profiles. There were no fatalities and only two patients (one from each group) developed hepatotoxicity. The "medical" length of stay was 31.9 hours shorter in the EDOU group compared to the inpatient ward group (23.3 versus 55.2 hours). EDOU patients have statistically significant savings (comparing bill size) of S$784 per patient. Conclusions Admission to the EDOU resulted in significant cost savings and 58% decreased LOS when compared to inpatient wards. The EDOU is a cost-effective and safe alternative for the management of selected paracetamol poisonings requiring NAC. Further studies would be needed to verify these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.