ArticleCureus2019
Digoxin Toxicity in a Patient with Pacemaker: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digoxin Dilemma: Diagnosing Toxicity Amidst Dementia.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
- Drug-Induced Complete Atrioventricular Block in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report Highlighting Digoxin-Beta Blocker Interactions and a Paradoxical State.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digoxin is a cardiac myocyte sodium/potassium ATPase inhibitor with a narrow therapeutic index used to treat patients with conditions such as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation. Currently, digoxin-specific antibody fragments serve as a therapeutic option in patients with digoxin toxicity; however, the indications for digoxin-specific antibody fragments are inconsistent, and some sources report a serum digoxin concentration of >12 ng/mL as a treatment indication. We discuss a case of an asymptomatic elevated digoxin level of 13.5 ng/mL secondary to a dosing error, who was managed without digoxin-specific antibody fragments as well as a brief retrospective chart review for patients with a pacemaker presenting with a high digoxin concentration managed with and without digoxin-specific antibody fragments, with equivocal findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.