Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819830›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2019

Positive Predictive Value of Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsies of Architectural Distortions Seen on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and without an Ultrasound Correlate.

Gopal R Vijayaraghavan, Adrienne Newburg, Srinivasan Vedantham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Breast X-Ray Imaging.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Value of BI-RADS 3 Audits.Biomedical journal of scientific & technical research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Update on Technology, Evidence, and Clinical Practice.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gopal R VijayaraghavanDepartment of Radiology, UMass School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States.
Adrienne NewburgDepartment of Radiology, UMass School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States.
Srinivasan VedanthamDepartment of Medical Imaging, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, United States.

Funding

Towards screening with high-resolution, low-dose, dedicated breast CTR01CA199044 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SRINIVASAN VEDANTHAM · 2016 to 2026
$6.1M
Reducing mastectomy rates in invasive lobular carcinoma by high-resolution 3D breast CTR01CA195512 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI VEDANTHAM, SRINIVASAN · 2015 to 2017
$757k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195512NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of architectural distortions (AD) observed on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and without an ultrasound (US) correlate. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this single-institution, retrospective study, patients who underwent DBT-guided biopsies of AD without any associated findings on digital mammography (DM) or DBT, and without a correlate on targeted US exam, over a 14-month period were included in this study. All patients had DM and DBT and targeted US exams. The PPV was computed along with the exact 95% confidence limits (CL) using simple binomial proportions, with histopathology as the reference standard.

resultsA total of 45 ADs in 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. Histopathology indicated 6/45 (PPV: 13.3%, CL: 5.1-26.8%), ADs were malignant, including one high-risk lesion that was upgraded at surgery. ADs were appreciated only on DBT in 12/45 (26.7%) patients, and on both DBT and DM in 33/45 (73.3%) patients, and the corresponding PPV was 25% (3/12, CL: 5.5-57.2%) and 9.1% (3/33, CL: 1.9-24.3%), respectively. In all analyses, the observed PPV significantly exceeded the 2% probability of malignancy for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-3 diagnostic categories (

conclusionsThe PPV of malignancy in DBT detected AD without an US correlate in our series of 45 cases was 6/45 (13.3%). In the absence of an US correlate, the PPV of AD is lower than that mentioned in prior literature but exceeds the 2% threshold to justify DBT-guided biopsy.

Indexed as

Architectural distortionBreastCancerDigital breast tomosynthesisPositive predictive value

Identifiers

PMID31819830
PMCPMC6884982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.