Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819804›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019

A pilot study of the duration of GP consultations in Ireland.

Tom Pierse, Luke Barry, Liam Glynn, Diarmuid Quinlan, Andrew Murphy, Ciaran O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tom Pierse1Health Economic and Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Luke Barry1Health Economic and Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Liam Glynn2Graduate Entry Medical School and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Diarmuid Quinlan3Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Andrew Murphy4Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ciaran O'Neill5Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioner (GP)-led primary care is the linchpin of health care in Ireland. Reflecting international trends, there are increasing concerns about the sustainability of the current Irish GP service due to an increasing workload. Objective data on the duration of GP consultations are currently not available in Ireland. The objective of this pilot study is to demonstrate how the duration of consultations can be collected, using readily available administrative data.

methodsSoftware was developed to extract the duration of GP consultations using the opening and closing of electronic patient records associated with a GP consultation. GP practices (

resultsThe average duration of a consultation was 14.1 min for the 9 years spanning 2010 to 2018. Patients had an average time between consultations of 99 days.

conclusionsThis pilot study confirms that an administrative data set can be utilised at negligible cost to monitor GP practice consultation workload over time. Our preliminary pilot data show that GP consultation durations among participating practices were longer than the 5-11.7 min reported in the UK and show an increase over the period. Clearly, a larger number of practices and patients are required to substantiate this finding.

Indexed as

Consultation durationConsultation timeGPGP workloadPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31819804
PMCPMC6886172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.