Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819803›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis: Validation of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL™) short forms.

Luis D Medina, Stephanie Torres, Enrique Alvarez, Brooke Valdez, Kavita V Nair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychometric analysis of the Neuro-QoL Fatigue in generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) using data from a phase 3 trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luis D MedinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8163-7772
Stephanie TorresDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, USA.
Enrique AlvarezDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA.
Brooke ValdezDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA.
Kavita V NairDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been shown to be effective for tracking treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, collecting PROs as part of the clinical standard of care can be time-consuming and examination of their validity for use in an MS sample has been limited.

objectiveTo determine the discriminant validity of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL™) short forms in a real-world MS clinic population. DESIGN/

methodsNeuro-QoL is a series of questionnaires for tracking physical function, emotional/cognitive health, and social abilities in clinical populations. Neuro-QoL data from 902 MS patients were analyzed for psychometric properties and factor structure.

resultsNeuro-QoL demonstrated acceptable reliability in the moderate-to-good ranges. Moderate support for convergent validity was observed with other measures of MS quality of life, disease severity, and symptoms. However, results from a confirmatory factor analysis suggested poor model fit for most of the 12 domains tested.

conclusionsThese findings support the utility of some of the Neuro-QoL questionnaires in evaluating MS-related PROs. However, additional research may help abridge and strengthen these measures for use in this population.

Indexed as

Multiple sclerosispatient-reported outcomesprincipal component analysisreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID31819803
PMCPMC6882038
OpenAlexW2991605080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.