Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819664›Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Acceptance Of HIV Testing And Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care In Gunino Health Center, Southern Ethiopia 2019: An Institutional Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu, Addisu Yeshambel Wassie, Kelemu Abebe Gelaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natnael Atnafu GebeyehuDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine,Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Addisu Yeshambel WassieDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine,Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Kelemu Abebe GelawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine,Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Wolaita Sodo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcceptance of human immune virus testing is an entry point of intervention to end mother to child transmission of the virus among pregnant women.

methodsInstitutional based cross-sectional study design with a sample size of 340 was conducted from May 20 to June 15, 2019. The data were collected by using systematic random sampling technique of interviewer administered questionnaire. Those candidate variables at bivariate analysis with a p-value <0.25 were moved to the multivariate logistic regression model to control for potential confounding variables, and P-value <0.05 at multivariate analysis was considered as cutoff point.

resultAmong the total of 340 pregnant women who participated with a response rate of 96%, 234 (68.8%) accepted testing. The odds of acceptance of human immune virus testing was higher among respondents who had awareness about mother to child transmission (AOR=2.602, 95%; CI:1.408-4.809) than their counterparts. It was also higher among respondents who had perceived the benefit of testing (AOR=1.838, 95%; CI:1.089-3.104) than those who did not perceive the benefit of testing. Participants who were knowledgeable about the prevention of mother to child transmission were more likely to accept testing (AOR=1.715, 95%; CI:1.030-2.855) than their counterparts. Besides, the odds of acceptance of testing among pregnant women who attended two and above antenatal appointments were higher (AOR= 2.485, 95%; CI:1.462-4.224) than participants who attended only one appointment. Participants who had no formal education (AOR=0.393, 95%; CI:0.160-0.967) and had a primary level of education (AOR=0.357,95%; CI:0.152-0.842) were less likely to accept human immune virus testing than women who had a diploma and above level of educational status.

conclusionAcceptance of human immune virus testing among pregnant women attending antenatal care clinics was relatively low. Antenatal caregivers should place emphasis on reducing barriers to testing, like lack of awareness, knowledge, and educational background.

Indexed as

acceptance of HIV testingantenatal carepregnant women

Identifiers

PMID31819664
PMCPMC6897068
OpenAlexW2990695924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.