ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2019
Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconceptualizing peptic ulcers as a psychosomatic disorder: a new etiological theory resolving a long-standing controversy surroundingFrontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Update on the pathogenesis and clinical management ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025Review
- A cross-sectional study of demographic profile and incidence ofInternational journal of surgery open · 2025Article
- A survey of pathogenic involvement in non-communicable human diseases.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Somatostatin in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Biology · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori, Salmonella typhi, Plasmodium falciparum, and Toxoplasma gondii infections and levels of liver function markers among Hepatitis B Virus infected Ghanaians: A cross-sectional study in the Greater Accra Region.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Comprehensive insights on treatment modalities with conventional and herbal drugs for the treatment of duodenal ulcers.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- Testing forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- Review
- Pivotal role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- A pilot study of non-invasive diagnostic tools to detect Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Crosstalk between3 Biotech · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are controversies on the causal role of
methodRelevant literature were searched from databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Hinari, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct.
resultThe review evidence supports a strong causal relation between
conclusionDespite controversies observed in the causal role of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.