Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819455›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2019

Empathy In Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Emanuele Pick, Johann R Kleinbub, Stefania Mannarini, Arianna Palmieri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Empathy in primary progressive aphasia: Neural signatures and longitudinal trajectories.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Necropolitics of Death in Neurodegeneration.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Cognitive empathy across the lifespan.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuele PickDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1463-4664
Johann R KleinbubDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1256-2089
Stefania MannariniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8446-785X
Arianna PalmieriDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0453-001X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmpathy, in its affective and cognitive components, is a crucial interpersonal ability. It is broadly studied in the field of psychopathology, whereas its study in the neurodegenerative diseases is relatively recent. Existing literature, though, focused on a reduced subset of considered diseases, which often found a compromise in empathy abilities. Organized knowledge about a more comprehensive set of diseases is lacking.

methodThe present PRISMA systematic review was aimed at collecting the current available literature concerning empathic alterations in adult patients affected by neurodegenerative diseases. It considered the different empathy components, evaluated existing patterns, the impact on patients' lives, and treatment considerations.

resultsOverall, the 32 retrieved studies describe a spread deterioration of empathic abilities in patients, with each disease displaying its own pattern of empathy functioning. Literature in this field is fragmented and of heterogeneous quality, and further studies are warranted to increase evidence of many preliminary results. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, we highlight the crucial importance of acknowledging empathy deficits in these diseases, showing their repercussion on both patients' and caregivers' quality of life, the establishment of a functional doctor-patient relationship, and the development of efficacious psychological intervention. These clinical approaches can be enriched by the knowledge of the spared abilities of patients affected by neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

doctor-patient relationshipempathymentalizingneurodegenerative diseasespsychological interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID31819455
PMCPMC6878921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.