Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819389›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2019

Determinants Of Antipsychotic Drugs Prescription Among Community-Living Older Adults With Dementia: A Population-Based Study Using Health Information Systems In The Lazio Region, Italy.

Anna Maria Bargagli, Silvia Cascini, Nera Agabiti, Ursula Kirchmayer, Claudia Marino, Marina Davoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Maria BargagliDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Silvia CasciniDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3519-148X
Nera AgabitiDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Ursula KirchmayerDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7732-0166
Claudia MarinoDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Agenzia Regionale Parchi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite recommendations from associations of geriatric and psychiatry societies and warnings from drug agencies, antipsychotic (AP) drugs are frequently used to control behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. APs are associated with a range of potential adverse events, including increased risk of cerebrovascular events and mortality. Evidence suggests limited efficacy of APs for aggression and psychosis. Our objectives were to investigate patterns and predictors for prescription of APs among older adults with dementia residing in a large region of central Italy, and to identify patient characteristics related to typical or atypical APs prescribing.

methodsThis is a retrospective population-based cohort study using data from regional health information systems (HIS). We included dementia patients aged ≥65 years residing in the Lazio region. The exposure was defined as new use vs non-use of APs. Dementia patients with incident use of APs during 2015 were followed-up from the date of first prescription to the earliest among discontinuation of use, death, or end of study (December 31, 2016).

resultsWe enrolled 24,735 dementia patients, 1727 (6.7%) new users and 23,008 non-users of APs. Forty-four percent of AP users were treated for more than 3 months, and among these about 60% received APs continuously for at least 12 months. Individuals using antidepressant or anti-dementia drugs had higher odds of being prescribed with APs (OR: 1.67 and OR: 1.86, respectively). Patients exposed to polypharmacy were less likely to receive APs (OR: 0.82). Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities were not associated with APs use. Low socio-economic position was associated with lower odds of atypical AP prescribing (OR: 0.57).

conclusionThe study showed that a not negligible proportion of patients had a period of AP use longer than recommended by guidelines. We identified socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with first use of APs, providing insight into prescribing practices in a community setting and useful information to address areas of potential inappropriateness.

Indexed as

Independent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsDatabases, FactualDementiaDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHealth Information SystemsHospitalizationHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesMaleAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCholinesterase Inhibitorsantipsychoticsdementiahealth information systemsolder adults

Identifiers

PMID31819389
PMCPMC6877449
OpenAlexW2991195837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.