ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2020
Proteomic analysis to define predictors of treatment response to adalimumab or methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular endotypes in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive exploratory autoantibody profiling in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate or tocilizumab.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Towards Personalized Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024Review
- Tailored therapeutic decision of rheumatoid arthritis using proteomic strategies: how to start and when to stop?Clinical proteomics · 2023Review
- -Omic Approaches and Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Toward Overcoming Treatment Failure in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Seropositivity for anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune arthritis, is associated with worse long-term disease outcomes. ACPA is ubiquitously tested in RA patients, but other autoantibodies exist (in both citrullinated and non-citrullinated form) which may provide additional information on RA subtypes and/or treatment response. We used a multiplex bead-based assay of 376 autoantibodies to test associations between these autoantibodies and treatment response in RA patients. Clusters of patients with similar autoantibody expression were defined and cluster membership was associated with treatment response. Thirty-four autoantibodies were differentially expressed in RA patients compared with healthy controls; citrullinated vimentin was associated with treatment response. A selection of citrullinated autoantibodies was found to be associated with treatment response in a subanalysis of ACPA-negative RA patients. Finer ACPA specificities in ACPA-negative RA patients may be predictive of treatment response and could represent a rich vein of future study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.