Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819121›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Prey capture analyses in the carnivorous aquatic waterwheel plant (Aldrovanda vesiculosa L., Droseraceae).

Simon Poppinga, Jassir Smaij, Anna Sofia Westermeier, Martin Horstmann, Sebastian Kruppert, Ralph Tollrian, Thomas Speck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Carnivorous Plants as Model Species for Recent and Further Studies.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  3. Phenolic Secondary Metabolites inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Immunocytochemical Analysis of Bifid Trichomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Chemometry ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon PoppingaPlant Biomechanics Group, Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. simon.poppinga@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5341-9188
Jassir SmaijPlant Biomechanics Group, Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Anna Sofia WestermeierPlant Biomechanics Group, Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-1254
Martin HorstmannDepartment of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-3212
Sebastian KruppertDepartment of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-8455
Ralph TollrianDepartment of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group, Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-2636
University of Freiburg · DERuhr University Bochum · DEIndigenous Education Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the predator-prey interactions between an Australian ecotype of the carnivorous waterwheel plant (Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Droseraceae) and its potential natural prey, the water flea Daphnia longicephala (Daphniidae), which also occurs in Australia. A. vesiculosa develops snap-traps, which close within ~10-100 ms after mechanical triggering by zooplankton prey. Prey capture attempts (PCAs) were recorded via high-speed cinematography in the laboratory. From 14 recorded PCAs, nine were successful for the plant (the prey was caught), and five were unsuccessful (prey could escape), resulting in a capture rate of ~64%. The prey animals' locomotion behaviour (antenna beat frequency and movement type) in trap vicinity or inside the open traps is very variable. Traps were mainly triggered with the second antennae. During trap closure, the animals moved only very little actively. A flight response in reaction to an initiated trap closure was not observed. However, several animals could escape, either by having a "lucky" starting position already outside the triggered trap, by freeing themselves after trap closure, or by being pressed out by the closing trap lobes. According to our observations in the successful PCAs, we hypothesize that the convex curvature of the two trap lobes (as seen from the outside) and the infolded trap rims are structural means supporting the capture and retention of prey. Our results are discussed in a broader biological context and promising aspects for future studies are proposed.

Indexed as

Food ChainAnimalsAustraliaCarnivorous PlantDaphniaDroseraceaeEcologyEcotypeModels, BiologicalMovementZooplankton

Identifiers

PMID31819121
PMCPMC6901478
OpenAlexW2992623285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.