Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31819073›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Accentuated osseointegration in osteogenic nanofibrous coated titanium implants.

Siddhartha Das, Kanchan Dholam, Sandeep Gurav, Kiran Bendale, Arvind Ingle, Bhabani Mohanty, Pradip Chaudhari, Jayesh R Bellare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The dental implant surface: a review of the past, present and future.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Additively Manufactured SiOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siddhartha DasDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, Maharashtra, India.
Kanchan DholamDepartment of Dental and Prosthetic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, HBNI, Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India.
Sandeep GuravDepartment of Dental and Prosthetic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, HBNI, Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4913-7270
Kiran BendaleAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, 410 210, Maharashtra, India.
Arvind IngleAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, 410 210, Maharashtra, India.
Bhabani MohantyAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, 410 210, Maharashtra, India.
Pradip ChaudhariAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, 410 210, Maharashtra, India.
Jayesh R BellareDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, Maharashtra, India. jb@iitb.ac.in.
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer · INIndian Institute of Technology Bombay · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anchoring of endosseous implant through osseointegration continues to be an important clinical need. Here, we describe the development of superior endosseous implant demonstrating enhance osseointegration, achieved through surface modification via coating of osteogenic nanofibres. The randomized bio-composite osteogenic nanofibres incorporating polycaprolactone, gelatin, hydroxyapatite, dexamethasone, beta-glycerophosphate and ascorbic acid were electrospun on titanium implants mimicking bone extracellular matrix and subsequently induced osteogenesis by targeting undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells present in the peri-implant niche to regenerate osseous tissue. In proof-of-concept experiment on rabbit study models (n = 6), micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT), histomorphometric analysis and biomechanical testing in relation to our novel osteogenic nanofibrous coated implants showed improved results when compared to uncoated controls. Further, no pathological changes were detected during gross examination and necropsy on peri-implant osseous tissues regenerated in response to such coated implants. The findings of the present study confirm that osteogenic nanofibrous coating significantly increases the magnitude of osteogenesis in the peri-implant zone and favours the dynamics of osseointegration.

Indexed as

Bone-Anchored ProsthesisNanofibersOsseointegrationTitaniumAnimalsBone ScrewsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleMaleMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningRabbitsTibiaX-Ray MicrotomographyCoated Materials, BiocompatibleTitanium

Identifiers

PMID31819073
PMCPMC6901521
OpenAlexW2993159261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.