Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31818845›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Concomitant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for extensive peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin: protocol of the multicentre, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation INTERACT trial.

Nadine Leonie de Boer, Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof, Eva V E Madsen, Marjolein Diepeveen, Esther van Meerten, Ruben A G van Eerden, Femke M de Man, Rachida Bouamar, Stijn L W Koolen, Ignace H J T de Hingh and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nadine Leonie de BoerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-1915
Alexandra R M Brandt-KerkhofDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva V E MadsenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein DiepeveenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther van MeertenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruben A G van EerdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke M de ManDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rachida BouamarDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Checca BakkersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Koen P RoversDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8174-2134
Geert-Jan M CreemersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maarten J DeenenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Onno W KranenburgDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander ConstantinidesDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0396-6233
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands pim.burger@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (DPOG)
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has become standard of care for patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin with a low/moderate abdominal disease load. In case of a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score >20, CRS-HIPEC is not considered to be beneficial. Patients with a PCI >20 are currently offered palliative systemic chemotherapy. Previous studies have shown that systemic chemotherapy is less effective against peritoneal metastases than it is against haematogenous spread of colorectal cancer. It is suggested that patients with peritoneal metastases may benefit from the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy. Aim of this study is to establish the maximum tolerated dose of intraperitoneal irinotecan, added to standard of care systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. Secondary endpoints are to determine the safety and feasibility of this treatment and to establish the pharmacokinetic profile of intraperitoneally administered irinotecan. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This phase I, '3+3' dose-escalation, study is performed in two Dutch tertiary referral centres. The study population consists of adult patients with extensive peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin who have a good performance status and no extra-abdominal metastases. According to standard work-up for CRS-HIPEC, patients will undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy to score the PCI. In case of a PCI >20, a peritoneal access port will be placed in the abdomen of the patient. Through this port we will administer intraperitoneal irinotecan, in combination with standard systemic treatment consisting of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin and the targeted agent bevacizumab. Therapy consists of a maximum of 12 cycles 2-weekly. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol is approved by a research medical ethics committee (Rotterdam, Netherlands) and the Dutch Competent Authority (CCMO, The Hague, Netherlands). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL6988 and NL2018-000479-33; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Research DesignAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsFluorouracilHumansInfusions, ParenteralIrinotecanLeucovorinMulticenter Studies as TopicOrganoplatinum CompoundsPeritoneal NeoplasmsFluorouracilIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum Compoundscolorectal cancerdose-escalation studyintraperitoneal chemotherapypalliative treatmentperitoneal metastasessystemic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31818845
PMCPMC6924694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.