ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Structural and Dynamical Signatures of Local DNA Damage in Live Cells.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myeloid reprogramming generates myeloid-derived activating cells to potentiate radiotherapy and suppress metastasis.Cancer cell · 2026Article
- The effect of microgravity and flows on the organization and dynamics of the human genome.Science advances · 2026Article
- Active processes shape and move the genome and nucleoplasm.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026Review
- Centromeres and telomeres as rheological probes of the human cell nucleus.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Feasibility of long-read sequencing to identify molecular alterations in an Indonesian cohort of locally advanced to advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transcription-dependent mobility of single genes and genome-wide motions in live human cells.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Transcription-induced active forces suppress chromatin motion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Technological advances in probing 4D genome organization.Current opinion in cell biology · 2023Review
- ATM-ESCO2-SMC3 axis promotes 53BP1 recruitment in response to DNA damage and safeguards genome integrity by stabilizing cohesin complex.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Characterizing locus specific chromatin structure and dynamics with correlative conventional and super-resolution imaging in living cells.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Multifaceted regulation and functions of 53BP1 in NHEJ‑mediated DSB repair (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2022Review
- Spatial organization of chromosomes leads to heterogeneous chromatin motion and drives the liquid- or gel-like dynamical behavior of chromatin.Genome research · 2022Article
- Interphase Chromatin Undergoes a Local Sol-Gel Transition upon Cell Differentiation.Physical review letters · 2021Article
- The rich inner life of the cell nucleus: dynamic organization, active flows, and emergent rheology.Biophysical reviews · 2020Review
- Multiscale Genome Organization: Dazzling Subject and Inventive Methods.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- The self-stirred genome: large-scale chromatin dynamics, its biophysical origins and implications.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamic organization of chromatin inside the cell nucleus plays a key role in gene regulation and genome replication, as well as maintaining genome integrity. Although the static folded state of the genome has been extensively studied, dynamical signatures of processes such as transcription or DNA repair remain an open question. Here, we investigate the interphase chromatin dynamics in human cells in response to local DNA damage, specifically, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Using simultaneous two-color spinning-disk confocal microscopy, we monitor the DSB dynamics and the compaction of the surrounding chromatin, visualized by fluorescently labeled 53BP1 and histone H2B, respectively. Our study reveals a surprising difference between the mobility of DSBs located in the nuclear interior versus periphery (less than 1 μm from the nuclear envelope), with the interior DSBs being almost twice as mobile as the periphery DSBs. Remarkably, we find that the DSB sites possess a robust structural signature in a form of a unique chromatin compaction profile. Moreover, our data show that the DSB motion is subdiffusive and ATP-dependent and exhibits unique dynamical signatures, different from those of undamaged chromatin. Our findings reveal that the DSB mobility follows a universal relationship defined solely by the physical parameters describing the DSBs and their local environment, such as the DSB focus size (represented by the local accumulation of 53BP1), DSB density, and the local chromatin compaction. This suggests that the DSB-related repair processes are robust and likely deterministic because the observed dynamical signatures (DSB mobility) can be explained solely by their structural features (DSB focus size, local chromatin compaction). Such knowledge might help in detecting local DNA damage in live cells, as well as in aiding our biophysical understanding of genome integrity in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.