Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31818464›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

Chromatin Is Frequently Unknotted at the Megabase Scale.

Dimos Goundaroulis, Erez Lieberman Aiden, Andrzej Stasiak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA superhelicity.Nucleic acids research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Theory of chromatin organization maintained by active loop extrusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Homology of homologous knotted proteins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  9. Topological gelation of reconnecting polymers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Active topological glass.Nature communications · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dimos GoundaroulisCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Erez Lieberman AidenCenter for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: erez@erez.com.
Andrzej StasiakCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: andrzej.stasiak@unil.ch.
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

GENOME WIDE MAPPING OF LOOPS USING IN SITU HI-CUM1HG009375 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2017 to 2021
$4.7M
Supplement - Beyond pairwise DNA contacts: exploring higher-order genome structure using proximity ligationU01HL130010 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG009375NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL130010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knots in the human genome would greatly impact diverse cellular processes ranging from transcription to gene regulation. To date, it has not been possible to directly examine the genome in vivo for the presence of knots. Recently, methods for serial fluorescent in situ hybridization have made it possible to measure the three-dimensional position of dozens of consecutive genomic loci in vivo. However, the determination of whether genomic trajectories are knotted remains challenging because small errors in the localization of a single locus can transform an unknotted trajectory into a highly knotted trajectory and vice versa. Here, we use stochastic closure analysis to determine if a genomic trajectory is knotted in the setting of experimental noise. We analyze 4727 deposited genomic trajectories of a 2-Mb-long chromatin interval from human chromosome 21. For 243 of these trajectories, their knottedness could be reliably determined despite the possibility of localization errors. Strikingly, in each of these 243 cases, the trajectory was unknotted. We note a potential source of bias insofar as knotted contours may be more difficult to reliably resolve. Nevertheless, our data are consistent with a model in which, at the scales probed, the human genome is often free of knots.

Indexed as

ChromatinHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceModels, MolecularChromatin

Identifiers

PMID31818464
PMCPMC7202934
OpenAlexW2987747009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.