Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31818214›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Novel Self-Report Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.

Hend Mansoor, Ara Jo, V Madsen Beau De Rochars, Carl J Pepine, Arch G Mainous

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A digital tool for self-reporting cardiovascular risk factors: The RADICAL study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel Self-Report Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hend MansoorDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy University of Florida Gainesville FL.
Ara JoDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy University of Florida Gainesville FL.
V Madsen Beau De RocharsDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy University of Florida Gainesville FL.
Carl J PepineDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville FL.
Arch G MainousDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy University of Florida Gainesville FL.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The currently used atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator relies on several measured variables and does not incorporate some well-established risk factors such as family history of premature myocardial infarction and other nontraditional risk factors. Our study aimed to develop and validate a simple risk score to predict 10-year risk of incident cardiovascular events using patient-reported information. Methods and Results Using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort, we identified adults with no previous history of cardiovascular disease and randomly divided the cohort into "development" (70%) and "validation" (30%) subgroups. Adjusted Cox regression modeling was used to develop a prediction model. The predictive performance of the new risk score was compared with the score derived from the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator. A total of 9285 individuals met the inclusion criteria. During follow-up (median 8.93 years), a total of 694 (7.47%) incident cardiovascular events occurred. The following 6 factors were included: male sex, age, current smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and family history of premature myocardial infarction. The C-statistic was 0.72 in the validation cohort with good calibration. The area under the curve for the simple risk score was comparable to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score. Conclusions The novel simple risk score is an easy-to-use tool to predict cardiovascular events in adults from self-reported information without need for laboratory or physical examination data. This risk score included 6-items and had comparable predictive performance to the guideline recommended atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score but relies solely on self-reported information.

Indexed as

Self ReportAgedAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime Factorscardiovascular diseaseprediction statisticsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31818214
PMCPMC6951080
OpenAlexW2994883461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.