Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31818048›Full record

Trial reportGut and liver2020

Comparison of Effectiveness between Abdominal Vibration Stimulation and Walking Exercise for Bowel Cleansing before Therapeutic Colonoscopy.

Choong-Kyun Noh, In Sung Kim, Gil Ho Lee, Jin Woong Park, Eunyoung Lee, Bumhee Park, Hye Jeon Hong, Sun Gyo Lim, Sung Jae Shin, Jin Hong Kim and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut and liver, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. An abdominal vibration combined with walking exercise (AVCWE) program for older patients with constipation: Development and feasibility study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Choong-Kyun NohDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3607-8120
In Sung KimDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3587-9735
Gil Ho LeeDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-0828
Jin Woong ParkDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8132-2789
Eunyoung LeeDepartments of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-9119
Bumhee ParkDepartments of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-1571
Hye Jeon HongGeneral Ward Nursing Unit, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5053-7522
Sun Gyo LimDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2045-5099
Sung Jae ShinDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-4435
Jin Hong KimDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3352-5079
Kee Myung LeeDepartments of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3785-693X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Adequate bowel preparation is important for successful colonoscopy. We aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of abdominal vibration stimulation in bowel preparation before therapeutic colonoscopy. Methods: A single center, prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study was performed between January 2016 and December 2016. Patients for therapeutic colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled and assigned to either the vibrator group or walking group. Patients who refused to participate in this study as part of the experimental group consented to register in the control group instead. During the preparation period, patients assigned to the walking group walked ≥3,000 steps, whereas those assigned to the vibrator group received abdominal vibrator stimulation and restricted walking. All patients received the same colon cleansing regimen: 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. Results: Three hundred patients who received PEG solution for therapeutic colonoscopy were finally enrolled in this study (n=100 per group). Bowel cleansing with abdominal vibration stimulation showed almost similar results to that with walking exercise (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score for the entire colon: vibrator vs walking vs control, 7.38±1.55 vs 7.39±1.55 vs 6.17±1.15, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the vibrator group and walking group regarding instances of diarrhea after taking PEG, time to first diarrhea after taking PEG, total procedure time, and patient satisfaction. Conclusions: This study indicates that, compared with conventional walking exercise, abdominal vibration stimulation achieved similar rates of bowel cleansing adequacy and colonoscopy success without compromising safety or patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

ExerciseVibrationWalkingAdultAgedCatharticsColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsProspective StudiesCatharticsPolyethylene GlycolsAbdominal vibrationBowel cleansingColonoscopyStimulationWalking exercise

Identifiers

PMID31818048
PMCPMC7366144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.