Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31817968›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Synaptic Plasticity Shapes Brain Connectivity: Implications for Network Topology.

Mario Stampanoni Bassi, Ennio Iezzi, Luana Gilio, Diego Centonze, Fabio Buttari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Corticosterone accelerates behavioral inflexibility via plasticity-related gene expression in the dorsal striatum.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario Stampanoni BassiUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.
Ennio IezziUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-0535
Luana GilioUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.
Diego CentonzeUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.
Fabio ButtariUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.

Funding

Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla 2019/S/1Ministero della Salute ricerca corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of brain network connectivity improved understanding on brain changes and adaptation in response to different pathologies. Synaptic plasticity, the ability of neurons to modify their connections, is involved in brain network remodeling following different types of brain damage (e.g., vascular, neurodegenerative, inflammatory). Although synaptic plasticity mechanisms have been extensively elucidated, how neural plasticity can shape network organization is far from being completely understood. Similarities existing between synaptic plasticity and principles governing brain network organization could be helpful to define brain network properties and reorganization profiles after damage. In this review, we discuss how different forms of synaptic plasticity, including homeostatic and anti-homeostatic mechanisms, could be directly involved in generating specific brain network characteristics. We propose that long-term potentiation could represent the neurophysiological basis for the formation of highly connected nodes (hubs). Conversely, homeostatic plasticity may contribute to stabilize network activity preventing poor and excessive connectivity in the peripheral nodes. In addition, synaptic plasticity dysfunction may drive brain network disruption in neuropsychiatric conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Optimal network architecture, characterized by efficient information processing and resilience, and reorganization after damage strictly depend on the balance between these forms of plasticity.

Indexed as

Long-Term PotentiationNeuronal PlasticityAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBrainHumansSchizophreniaAlzheimer’s disease (AD)brain networksconnectivitylong-term potentiation (LTP)resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI)schizophreniasynaptic plasticitysynaptic scaling

Identifiers

PMID31817968
PMCPMC6940892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.