Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31817843›Full record

ReviewToxins2019

Critical Analysis of Neuronal Cell and the Mouse Bioassay for Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxins.

Sabine Pellett, William H Tepp, Eric A Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A local outbreak of iatrogenic botulism associated with cosmetic injections of botulinum neurotoxin-containing products, England, 2025.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabine PellettDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
William H TeppDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Eric A JohnsonDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vaccines Against BotulismR01AI118389 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, PELLETT, SABINE · 2015 to 2024
$6.1M
Characteristics of Botulinum Neurotoxins the Determine PotencyR01AI139306 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Joseph T Barbieri, Sabine Pellett · 2019 to 2026
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118389NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139306NIAID NIH HHS R01AI139306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum Neurotoxins (BoNTs) are a large protein family that includes the most potent neurotoxins known to humankind. BoNTs delivered locally in humans at low doses are widely used pharmaceuticals. Reliable and quantitative detection of BoNTs is of paramount importance for the clinical diagnosis of botulism, basic research, drug development, potency determination, and detection in clinical, environmental, and food samples. Ideally, a definitive assay for BoNT should reflect the activity of each of the four steps in nerve intoxication. The in vivo mouse bioassay (MBA) is the 'gold standard' for the detection of BoNTs. The MBA is sensitive, robust, semi-quantitative, and reliable within its sensitivity limits. Potential drawbacks with the MBA include assay-to-assay potency variations, especially between laboratories, and false positives or negatives. These limitations can be largely avoided by careful planning and performance. Another detection method that has gained importance in recent years for research and potency determination of pharmaceutical BoNTs is cell-based assays, as these assays can be highly sensitive, quantitative, human-specific, and detect fully functional holotoxins at physiologically relevant concentrations. A myriad of other in vitro BoNT detection methods exist. This review focuses on critical factors and assay limitations of the mouse bioassay and cell-based assays for BoNT detection.

Indexed as

Biological AssayAnimalsBotulinum ToxinsHumansMiceNeuronsNeurotoxinsBotulinum ToxinsNeurotoxinsBoNTbotulinum neurotoxincell assaydetectionin vitro BoNT assaysmouse bioassayneurons

Identifiers

PMID31817843
PMCPMC6950160
OpenAlexW2992766138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.