ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Three-Dimensional Digital Reconstruction of Ti
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Two-Stage Reconstruction of Microstructures with Arbitrarily Shaped Inclusions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Α digital reconstruction technique is presented that generates three-dimensional (3D) digital representations of ceramic foams created by the foam-gelcasting technique. The reconstruction process uses information that is directly extracted from Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images and offers a 3D representation of the physical sample accounting for the typically large pore cavities and interconnecting windows that are formed during the preparation process. Contrary to typical tessellation-based foam treatments, a spherical representation of the pores and the pore windows of the foams is assumed and a novel hybrid algorithm that combines a variation of Lubachevsky-type and Random Close Packing of Hard Spheres (RCPHS) algorithms has been developed to obtain near-optimum solutions to the packing problem of the spheres that represent the pores. Numerical simulations are performed directly on the 3D reconstructed foams to determine their gas permeability. The model predictions are compared with experimental gas permeability data that were obtained for the physical samples. The pore wall thickness can be treated as the single fitting parameter in the entire reconstruction process, although it is shown that images of sufficient resolution could eliminate the need even for that. The foams that are produced by this method yield quantitatively similar pressure drops with experiments for various superficial velocity values, with a very small deviation in the range of 1.7%-2.8%. The proposed methodology could be utilized for the prediction of the permeability and transport properties of complex foamy porous structures, similar to the gelcast-type of foams, from a single SEM image of the foam sample without resorting to serial tomography or other structural information, thus saving considerable time and effort from experimental work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.